We performed a comparison between CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] and NetIQ Privileged Account Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).Earn 20 points
CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM) while NetIQ Privileged Account Manager is ranked 26th in Privileged Access Management (PAM). CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is rated 7.8, while NetIQ Privileged Account Manager is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] writes "I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetIQ Privileged Account Manager writes "Has a useful credential vault feature but the user interface needs to be improved". CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is most compared with , whereas NetIQ Privileged Account Manager is most compared with .
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
