CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] vs Osirium comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] and Osirium based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).
To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Views
224
Comparisons
174
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA Access Control, CA Privileged Identity Manager
Learn More
Overview
CA Access Control provides tools to protect your system in both ways against unauthorized use of computer resources: block unauthorized users from accessing the system and block authorized users from accessing items to which they should not have access. CA Access Control also provides auditing tools that let you trace users' activities to track attempted misuse of the computer system.

Osirium protects organisations by securing and simplifying the complexities of privileged user management in multi-vendor infrastructures.

Sample Customers
Colruyt Group, Logicalis, TIS Inc.
Mental Health Concern, M-Netics, NHS, Thinkmoney
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise44%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM) while Osirium is ranked 23rd in Privileged Access Management (PAM). CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is rated 7.8, while Osirium is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] writes "I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult". On the other hand, CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Osirium is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.