• Home
  • CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] vs. Thycotic Group Management Server [EOL]

CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] vs Thycotic Group Management Server [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] and Thycotic Group Management Server [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).
To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult.
It gives us the ability to track who is using what ID and for what purpose.
Use Thycotic Group Management Server [EOL]?
Ranking
Unranked
In Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Unranked
In Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA Access Control, CA Privileged Identity Manager
Learn More
Broadcom
Delinea
Video Not Available
Overview
CA Access Control provides tools to protect your system in both ways against unauthorized use of computer resources: block unauthorized users from accessing the system and block authorized users from accessing items to which they should not have access. CA Access Control also provides auditing tools that let you trace users' activities to track attempted misuse of the computer system.

Thycotic Group Management Server empowers non-IT Business managers to securely manage their department's Active Directory Groups without assigning them to a privileged account.

Using Group Management Server business department heads can easily manage their AD groups, ensuring the right people are included in their email groups, giving their staff the correct access to file systems. Group Management Server provides attestation of who has access to what, a major benefit in demonstrating proper governance and risk management.

Sample Customers
Colruyt Group, Logicalis, TIS Inc.
BAE Systems, Microsoft Game Studios, Adobe, USDA, Honda, Back United, Garmin, Activision, NATO, NPR, Vistaprint, HubSpot, Kellogg's, AT&T, Kaplan Medical, AAA, Netflix, De Beers
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise44%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM) while Thycotic Group Management Server [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM). CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is rated 7.8, while Thycotic Group Management Server [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] writes "I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult". On the other hand, CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Thycotic Group Management Server [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.