Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
It reduces the viral attacks on my website. It also allows certain users access to see what happens daily.
We have received good support from the tech support team.
CA PAM is working well for us.
The DB clustering is a really good benefit of using CA PAM.
We can enforce complicated password policies and very important frequent password changes.
The product is very scalable in terms of concurrent sessions that it can handle at a time, number of device it can support, accounts that it can manage, or number of nodes that you can deploy in a cluster.
The key benefits are we improve our governance. We ensure we can build more trust in the way we run and operate our environment, and most of all is the accountability.
One of the key things for us about the product is around its simplicity. Being able to put in the technology that allows the business to remove complexity and also allow the security improvements.
The most valuable features are that it is easy to manage and it's stable.
The solution's most valuable feature is the authentication for the consumers. The integration with other third-party applications is excellent.
The setup is complex.
I would like this solution to be simpler. It should have a one-click access that works together with AWS.
An improvement for this solution is that it should not be constantly based on user name and password. There should be a condition to edit and update your username.
We experience stability issues after every patch upgrade. This is a place where CA needs to improve drastically.
The service account management functionality needs to be extended to application pools, SQL database, PowerShell scripts, service account discovery, etc.
Bring more technology into the portfolio and being able to collapse those products into a much more integrated way.
They need to do a little bit more on the mainframe side.
Instead of just giving passwords to the user based on job function, from auditing perspective, turn that cycle around. That would really help from an auditing standpoint.
They should improve the solution by include reporting.
The identity management model needs a bit of improvement.
Pricing and Cost Advice
It is reasonably priced.
It is more expensive than other solutions on the market.
I would prefer better licensing options for the 20-100 users we have at a given time.
Pricing is fair compared to other top vendors.
The licensing is simple and scalable.
Cost-wise, CA was better compared to others in the market.
Information Not Available
out of 22 in Privileged Access Management
Average Words per Review
out of 25 in Access Management
Average Words per Review
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
|CA PAM, Xceedium Xsuite|
|CA (A Broadcom Company)||ForgeRock|
CA Privileged Access Manager is a simple-to-deploy, automated, proven solution for privileged access management in physical, virtual and cloud environments. It enhances security by protecting sensitive administrative credentials such as root and administrator passwords, controlling privileged user access, proactively enforcing policies and monitoring and recording privileged user activity across all IT resources. It includes CA PAM Server Control (previously CA Privileged Identity Manager) for fine-grained protection of critical servers
|Open source provisioning solution for real-time user management life cycle automation.|
Learn more about CA Privileged Access Manager
Learn more about ForgeRock
|NEOVERA, Telesis, eSoft||Geico, Thomson Reuters, Salesforce, McKesson, Trinet, SKY, BNP Paribas, Deloitte, Capgemini, North Western University|
Financial Services Firm25%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm24%
Software R&D Company23%
Comms Service Provider14%
Software R&D Company32%
Financial Services Firm12%