We performed a comparison between CA Process Automation and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."It is easy to debug and troubleshoot."
"This tool is used in my organization for automating IT infrastructure related incidents or service requests."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"Make some of the features more open source that way developers can have more flexibility."
"OCR capability should be added as a feature."
"It needs auto-triggering of workflows based on machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI)."
"Somehow the product group within CA left the product dry from some regular expression functionality."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
Earn 20 points
CA Process Automation is ranked 29th in Process Automation while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. CA Process Automation is rated 8.6, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of CA Process Automation writes "Provides the ability to import objects as new versions of existing objects and to make the prior version the current version". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". CA Process Automation is most compared with BMC TrueSight Orchestration, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.