CA Risk Authentication [EOL] vs Datablink Device 200 comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Risk Authentication [EOL] and Datablink Device 200 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Authentication Systems
53rd
Views
69
Comparisons
57
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA RiskMinder
Learn More
Datablink
Video Not Available
Overview

CA Risk Authentication is a powerful risk-based, adaptive authentication solution that works in real time to evaluate context, calculate a risk score, recommend actions and provide alerts/case management. It has a strong set of prebuilt rules to detect risk and an easy-to-use risk management console to adjust parameters or create new rules. The risk engine examines many factors including device identification, geolocation, IP address and user activity to evaluate risk. The calculated risk score is then fed into your policies to decide whether to authorize the current activity, request step-up authentication and/or send an alert or block the activity. This provides your organization with a transparent layer of protection against identity theft, data breaches and fraud. CA Risk Authentication can be used to reduce fraud and protect users from Internet attacks whether they are shopping online or accessing confidential or private information via a Web portal or application. It also provides organizations the ability to enforce different levels of authentication depending on the user activity, transaction value and the calculated risk score.

Datablink Device 200 offers significantly enhanced security compared to traditional tokens. Through patented technology, Datablink Device 200 creates a secure channel with the backend of the financial institution. It enables advanced authentication and financial transaction signing by reading a blinking image and generating a one-time use challenge and response-based dynamic password or signature. Unlike competitive solutions, Datablink Device 200 is a truly intuitive solution that offers unmatched ease of use with its unique screen reading technology.

Sample Customers
Global bank based in the United States
Mizuho, Banco Paulista, BTGPactual, Cetip, Telefonica, FIS, TOTVS, ICBC, Azul, Sicob, Unimed, Ype, Digitro, Brinks, Martins, Sicredi
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA Risk Authentication [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems while Datablink Device 200 is ranked 53rd in Authentication Systems. CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Datablink Device 200 is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CA Risk Authentication [EOL] writes "If we spot anomalies we can step up authentication. The policy entrance should learn from that state rather than reverting back to what it believes is the static good". On the other hand, CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Datablink Device 200 is most compared with Swivel Secure PINsafe.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.