We performed a comparison between CA Risk Authentication [EOL] and RSA Authentication Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.Earn 20 points
CA Risk Authentication [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems while RSA Authentication Manager is ranked 14th in Authentication Systems with 10 reviews. CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is rated 7.0, while RSA Authentication Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CA Risk Authentication [EOL] writes "If we spot anomalies we can step up authentication. The policy entrance should learn from that state rather than reverting back to what it believes is the static good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Authentication Manager writes "A highly effective and versatile solution that excels in terms of security, integration, scalability, and customer support". CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is most compared with , whereas RSA Authentication Manager is most compared with Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, RSA SecurID, RSA Adaptive Authentication and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.