• Home
  • CA Risk Authentication [EOL] vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

CA Risk Authentication [EOL] vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Risk Authentication [EOL] and RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
If we spot anomalies we can step up authentication. The policy entrance should learn from that state rather than...
At the moment, we are using it in America in our wealth-management space. From an organizational perspective, it is a good system because the... Read more →
Harshul Nayak
Lacking customization, poor support, but useful auditing
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Pricing varies based on user count/number of modules you need."
  • "We are using the cloud platform, but we don't find it compatible to be served as a multi-tenant platform. This is a large drawback. It becomes expensive because it is then an all-dedicated solution. You have to have a separate tenant for each client, which increases the cost. The overall unit pricing can be less expensive than how it is right now."
  • "I rate the product's price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

    • More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?
    Top Answer:With the tool in place, you need to hire fewer people to provide access, and you have control over your processes.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What needs improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?
    Top Answer:Every connector that you have in the product needs to be custom-built, so there are not a lot of standard connectors available in the product, because of which there are a lot of hidden consultancy… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?
    Top Answer:RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle can be deployed on the cloud or on-premise. We have our own proprietary cloud solution created along with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and it's deployed… more »
    Read all 3 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Authentication Systems
    22nd
    out of 76 in Identity Management (IM)
    Views
    941
    Comparisons
    646
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    726
    Rating
    6.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA RiskMinder
    SecurID
    Learn More
    Broadcom
    RSA
    Overview

    CA Risk Authentication is a powerful risk-based, adaptive authentication solution that works in real time to evaluate context, calculate a risk score, recommend actions and provide alerts/case management. It has a strong set of prebuilt rules to detect risk and an easy-to-use risk management console to adjust parameters or create new rules. The risk engine examines many factors including device identification, geolocation, IP address and user activity to evaluate risk. The calculated risk score is then fed into your policies to decide whether to authorize the current activity, request step-up authentication and/or send an alert or block the activity. This provides your organization with a transparent layer of protection against identity theft, data breaches and fraud. CA Risk Authentication can be used to reduce fraud and protect users from Internet attacks whether they are shopping online or accessing confidential or private information via a Web portal or application. It also provides organizations the ability to enforce different levels of authentication depending on the user activity, transaction value and the calculated risk score.

    RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.
    Sample Customers
    Global bank based in the United States
    NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Authentication Systems
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Risk Authentication [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is ranked 22nd in Identity Management (IM) with 9 reviews. CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is rated 7.0, while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of CA Risk Authentication [EOL] writes "If we spot anomalies we can step up authentication. The policy entrance should learn from that state rather than reverting back to what it believes is the static good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle writes "Lacking customization, poor support, but useful auditing". CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is most compared with , whereas RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt, One Identity Manager, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine).

    We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.