CA Risk Authentication [EOL] vs Entrust Identity Essentials comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Risk Authentication [EOL] and Entrust Identity Essentials based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Authentication Systems
Views
79
Comparisons
68
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA RiskMinder
SMS PASSCODE
Learn More
Entrust Datacard
Video Not Available
Overview

CA Risk Authentication is a powerful risk-based, adaptive authentication solution that works in real time to evaluate context, calculate a risk score, recommend actions and provide alerts/case management. It has a strong set of prebuilt rules to detect risk and an easy-to-use risk management console to adjust parameters or create new rules. The risk engine examines many factors including device identification, geolocation, IP address and user activity to evaluate risk. The calculated risk score is then fed into your policies to decide whether to authorize the current activity, request step-up authentication and/or send an alert or block the activity. This provides your organization with a transparent layer of protection against identity theft, data breaches and fraud. CA Risk Authentication can be used to reduce fraud and protect users from Internet attacks whether they are shopping online or accessing confidential or private information via a Web portal or application. It also provides organizations the ability to enforce different levels of authentication depending on the user activity, transaction value and the calculated risk score.

Fast, cost effective multi-factor authentication (MFA) solution that lets Windows-based organizations realize a Zero Trust approach.

Sample Customers
Global bank based in the United States
Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, AVEA, AZ Klina, Bashneft, BSR, Coop, Day Group, DEME, Digitale Gardemoen iks, Herbert Smith Freehills, Holstebro Kommune, Horten, Ikano, Intersport, JB Hifi, King Faisal special hospital and research center, Leaseplan, McDonald's, NSB, NZ Telecom, Orkla, Postnord, Rom Telecom, Slater and Gordon, Supercell, Transgrid, UPM, Widex
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA Risk Authentication [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems while Entrust Identity Essentials is ranked 5th in Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA). CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Entrust Identity Essentials is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CA Risk Authentication [EOL] writes "If we spot anomalies we can step up authentication. The policy entrance should learn from that state rather than reverting back to what it believes is the static good". On the other hand, CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Entrust Identity Essentials is most compared with .

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.