CA Risk Authentication [EOL] vs Venafi comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
views| comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Venafi Logo
701 views|406 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Risk Authentication [EOL] and Venafi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:We use Venafi for PKI certificates.
Top Answer:Venafi's overall installation could be made easier. You have to install the client, then go to the console and push the certificate.
Top Answer:Venafi has some additional functionalities for managing PKI certificates compared to other certificate deployment products. I would recommend Venafi to other users. Overall, I rate Venafi an eight out… more »
Ranking
Unranked
In Authentication Systems
18th
Views
701
Comparisons
406
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
301
Rating
8.5
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA RiskMinder
Learn More
Overview

CA Risk Authentication is a powerful risk-based, adaptive authentication solution that works in real time to evaluate context, calculate a risk score, recommend actions and provide alerts/case management. It has a strong set of prebuilt rules to detect risk and an easy-to-use risk management console to adjust parameters or create new rules. The risk engine examines many factors including device identification, geolocation, IP address and user activity to evaluate risk. The calculated risk score is then fed into your policies to decide whether to authorize the current activity, request step-up authentication and/or send an alert or block the activity. This provides your organization with a transparent layer of protection against identity theft, data breaches and fraud. CA Risk Authentication can be used to reduce fraud and protect users from Internet attacks whether they are shopping online or accessing confidential or private information via a Web portal or application. It also provides organizations the ability to enforce different levels of authentication depending on the user activity, transaction value and the calculated risk score.

Venafi automates protection for machine identities, which all organizations rely on to keep communications between machines secure and private. Venafi generates the machine identity intelligence necessary to automatically safeguard the flow of information to trusted machines and prevent communication with untrusted ones - all at machine speed and scale.
Sample Customers
Global bank based in the United States
Surescripts, CME Group, TD Bank Group, Aetna, MoneyGram, Zions Bancorp, Cisco
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm22%
Energy/Utilities Company11%
Manufacturing Company8%
Computer Software Company8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise74%
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA Risk Authentication [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems while Venafi is ranked 18th in Authentication Systems with 3 reviews. CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Venafi is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CA Risk Authentication [EOL] writes "If we spot anomalies we can step up authentication. The policy entrance should learn from that state rather than reverting back to what it believes is the static good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Venafi writes "The solution has some additional functionalities for managing PKI certificates compared to other products". CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Venafi is most compared with DigiCert PKI Platform, AppViewX CERT+, Entrust Identity Enterprise and Cisco Duo.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.