We performed a comparison between CA Role and Compliance Manager [EOL] and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, One Identity, Omada and others in User Provisioning Software.More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CA Role and Compliance Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Provisioning Software while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews. CA Role and Compliance Manager [EOL] is rated 5.0, while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of CA Role and Compliance Manager [EOL] writes "A compliance manager is able to see things he wouldn't otherwise be able to see, although I can't run it across all systems because some of them don't have all the required configurations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". CA Role and Compliance Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard.
We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.