We performed a comparison between CA Role and Compliance Manager [EOL] and Fischer Identity Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SailPoint, One Identity and others in Identity Management (IM).Earn 20 points
Earn 20 points
CA Role and Compliance Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Identity Management (IM) while Fischer Identity Governance is ranked 43rd in Identity Management (IM). CA Role and Compliance Manager [EOL] is rated 5.0, while Fischer Identity Governance is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of CA Role and Compliance Manager [EOL] writes "A compliance manager is able to see things he wouldn't otherwise be able to see, although I can't run it across all systems because some of them don't have all the required configurations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fischer Identity Governance writes "Initial setup was a bit complex because we needed to implement lots of workflows". CA Role and Compliance Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Fischer Identity Governance is most compared with .
See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.