We performed a comparison between CA Role and Compliance Manager [EOL] and RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SailPoint, One Identity and others in Identity Management (IM).More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CA Role and Compliance Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Identity Management (IM) while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is ranked 22nd in Identity Management (IM) with 9 reviews. CA Role and Compliance Manager [EOL] is rated 5.0, while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of CA Role and Compliance Manager [EOL] writes "A compliance manager is able to see things he wouldn't otherwise be able to see, although I can't run it across all systems because some of them don't have all the required configurations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle writes "Lacking customization, poor support, but useful auditing". CA Role and Compliance Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt, One Identity Manager, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine).
See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.