CA Spectrum vs CA Unified Infrastructure Management

CA Spectrum is ranked 3rd in Event Monitoring with 58 reviews vs CA Unified Infrastructure Management which is ranked 1st in Event Monitoring with 57 reviews. The top reviewer of CA Spectrum writes "It has a REST API and is customisable using standard features". The top reviewer of CA Unified Infrastructure Management writes "Time to Threshold and Time over Threshold help reduce event noise to a level that operation teams can manage". CA Spectrum is most compared with Nagios XI, CA Unified Infrastructure Management and IBM Tivoli NetCool. CA Unified Infrastructure Management is most compared with Nagios XI, SolarWinds NPM and SCOM. See our CA Spectrum vs CA Unified Infrastructure Management report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Ca spectrum vs. ca unified infrastructure management report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Spectrum vs CA Unified Infrastructure Management and others in Event Monitoring.
269,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing CA Spectrum vs CA Unified Infrastructure Management

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
The monitoring just comes to us: "Oh, there's something wrong with that machine." It tells us. There are some 50,000 machines or so, all doing different things. And if they go down we hear about it.It helps our NetOps group actually handle alarms in a way that lets them see the bigger picture of those alarms, and how they might affect our services. It helps us communicate information about the network state better to services that might be impacted by a specific network condition.As the kind of enterprise that straddles the line between telco size and enterprise size, it scales for us, because we're not all the way at telco yet.​It covers a lot of different types of hardware. It can do a lot and saves us time.​It is very stable. We have not had any major issues in over 10 years.​The stability of the product is key. It never breaks, really. The stability and reliability of the Spectrum product have been top-notch.​I can use it to detect whenever things go wrong on my network.We can plan changes and replacement of end-of-life products in our environment very well because it's very accurate.

Read more »

The benefit is easy installation. Thus, the model approach of the product and out-of-the-box probes, which deliver direct value.You can integrate clouds, hybrid infrastructure, and on-premise infrastructure into one product.It is the foundation for our monitoring solution.Having all of our information within one tool set; our alerts, our monitors, and the things that our operations team needs to function.It reduced cycles for a lot of quick out-of-the-box functionality. It also allowed us to get away from being stuck in SNMP, VTP V2, based off of agent deployment.Easy admin functionality. You can quickly do all the admin functionality without reducing cycles.It's easy to push out across numerous servers. Very scalable.The number of probes available. Out of the box, I believe about 200 probes are available. And, if there's a probe that is not available, you can write one. You can also go to the communities and suggest, and based on demand, CA will write one for you.

Read more »

Cons
If they could interact with the MIBs of vendors better, and have a lot more pre-loaded ones, that would be amazing for us right now.The Spectrum OneClick is a Java-based client, and that's aging. Really, before any new feature integration, I'd love to see a comprehensive rebuild of the UI.The upgrade process could be smoother. More of the steps around upgrading could be automated.A better integration with the UIM, as far as being able to do root cause analysis and that type of analytics.Needs better integration with all the other products in the Agile suite of tools; anything they could do to make that less complex, would be great.If nobody else has said the documentation needs improvement, let's go there. I understand, you can either write about it or you can do it. And most of us would rather they do it, but now that they've done it, those of us that didn't do it, we need to go and find: "Where did they write about this to tell us how to do it?" That's always lacking.We have had one support issue that's been open for a couple of months, and it is currently open.​I would like to see them eliminate the Java console. The user interface for this is a Java applet that runs on your desktop, and it is very problematic for us.

Read more »

​We want to see more investment in the UI and the dashboard.How we can get more native information from CA's solutions.They need to continue to advance the filter capabilities, and provide more input fields.I would like to see auditability. We've built our own audit functionality to ensure that every CI has the desired model configuration applied to it. And we run that on a daily basis. If that became part of the product, I think it might be a little bit less intensive in terms of resource, because we're doing it with scripts.It is a little complex to use versus other softwares.The biggest feature that I've been hoping they would enhance on is inventory management: things like adding/removing nodes.It needs a little bit more functionality in the Admin Console.The UIM has no features through goods and services yet. ​

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The cost of some of these products are a little cost prohibitive, which is unfortunate. We have to find lower cost solutions for some of the things that we have to pull in. For the most part, CA has capabilities in pretty much everything that you would need. You just have to figure out where are you going to spend the most money for what you have to actually get done. You can do all these things but, which ones do you have to do? And that's hard to choose sometimes because you want to do them all.It’s a great tool, but an expensive one. Learn how to use it properly.It is very pricey. With the current trend of enterprises moving towards cheaper and more modern looking solutions like ManageEngine, SevOne, ServicePilot, and Paesller.

Read more »

Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices.The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots.The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall.This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine).

Read more »

Ca spectrum vs. ca unified infrastructure management report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Spectrum vs CA Unified Infrastructure Management and others in Event Monitoring.
269,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
23,341
Comparisons
5,506
Reviews
57
Followers
1,223
Avg. Rating
8.4
Views
36,175
Comparisons
9,192
Reviews
57
Followers
1,956
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
3gaoi2h254k0canb4hxj 400x400
Compared 14% of the time.
Ibm
Compared 10% of the time.
See more CA Spectrum competitors »
See more CA Unified Infrastructure Management competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsCA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM
Website/Video
Website/VideoCA Technologies
  • Vendor 6987 screenshot 1524992460
CA Technologies
  • Vendor 6987 screenshot 1524992460
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewCA Spectrum can enable your organization to discover, optimize and improve its infrastructure and the business services running on top of it. By delivering large-enterprise scalability, robust features and superior root cause analysis, this solution can help your organization effectively manage its dynamic, complex IT infrastructure including physical, virtual and cloud environments as well as network virtualization.

CA UIM provides a single, unified platform that allows you to monitor your entire IT environment, both inside and outside the data center. It offers the ease-of-use and simplicity associated with point IT monitoring tools, featuring a unique powerful architecture with a lightweight footprint. At the same time, it delivers enterprise scalability and multi-tenancy that power some of the most complex infrastructures.

OFFER
Learn more about CA Spectrum
Learn more about CA Unified Infrastructure Management
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersNational Informatics Centre India, Banese, Olympus, AlphaServe Technologies, SicrediCBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
16%
Healthcare Company
12%
Insurance Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
24%
Comms Service Provider
22%
Retailer
10%
Healthcare Company
7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
24%
Healthcare Company
12%
Insurance Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider
15%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Insurance Company
6%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
12%
Midsize Enterprise
15%
Large Enterprise
73%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
18%
Midsize Enterprise
23%
Large Enterprise
58%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
19%
Midsize Enterprise
17%
Large Enterprise
63%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
15%
Midsize Enterprise
23%
Large Enterprise
62%
Ca spectrum vs. ca unified infrastructure management report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Spectrum vs CA Unified Infrastructure Management and others in Event Monitoring.
Download now
269,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email