CA Spectrum vs Statseeker

CA Spectrum is ranked 5th in Network Monitoring Software with 58 reviews vs Statseeker which is ranked 12th in Network Monitoring Software with 11 reviews. The top reviewer of CA Spectrum writes "It has a REST API and is customisable using standard features". The top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Key for me is that it doesn't aggregate the information up; I can look at detailed information going back quite a long time". CA Spectrum is most compared with Nagios XI, CA Unified Infrastructure Management and IBM Tivoli NetCool. Statseeker is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Nagios XI and PRTG. See our CA Spectrum vs Statseeker report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Ca spectrum vs. statseeker report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Spectrum vs Statseeker and others in Network Monitoring Software.
269,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing CA Spectrum vs Statseeker

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
The monitoring just comes to us: "Oh, there's something wrong with that machine." It tells us. There are some 50,000 machines or so, all doing different things. And if they go down we hear about it.It helps our NetOps group actually handle alarms in a way that lets them see the bigger picture of those alarms, and how they might affect our services. It helps us communicate information about the network state better to services that might be impacted by a specific network condition.As the kind of enterprise that straddles the line between telco size and enterprise size, it scales for us, because we're not all the way at telco yet.​It covers a lot of different types of hardware. It can do a lot and saves us time.​It is very stable. We have not had any major issues in over 10 years.​The stability of the product is key. It never breaks, really. The stability and reliability of the Spectrum product have been top-notch.​I can use it to detect whenever things go wrong on my network.We can plan changes and replacement of end-of-life products in our environment very well because it's very accurate.

Read more »

Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly.Key features for us are custom reporting, 95th Percentile, and trend lines.The most important feature for us is the interface statistics, because our customer normally asks us for bandwidth utilization reports. Statseeker has very descriptive transmit and receive information.The most important feature is just the fact that it doesn't aggregate the information up, and I can look at detailed information going back quite a long time.If you need a product that's able to monitor all the ports in your environment or all the ports that you want, this is a great product to use. Statseeker is quite flexible in tailoring the product, spending time tailoring the product with you. It's fairly low maintenance. It's quite quick.Grouping, Threshold/alerts, Netflow analyser, Private MIB object support are most valuable as they can provide more visibility into network performance, and for network troubleshooting.It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages.

Read more »

Cons
If they could interact with the MIBs of vendors better, and have a lot more pre-loaded ones, that would be amazing for us right now.The Spectrum OneClick is a Java-based client, and that's aging. Really, before any new feature integration, I'd love to see a comprehensive rebuild of the UI.The upgrade process could be smoother. More of the steps around upgrading could be automated.A better integration with the UIM, as far as being able to do root cause analysis and that type of analytics.Needs better integration with all the other products in the Agile suite of tools; anything they could do to make that less complex, would be great.If nobody else has said the documentation needs improvement, let's go there. I understand, you can either write about it or you can do it. And most of us would rather they do it, but now that they've done it, those of us that didn't do it, we need to go and find: "Where did they write about this to tell us how to do it?" That's always lacking.We have had one support issue that's been open for a couple of months, and it is currently open.​I would like to see them eliminate the Java console. The user interface for this is a Java applet that runs on your desktop, and it is very problematic for us.

Read more »

Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points.The main issue I've seen, in the last six months to a year, is when I upgrade I seem to be hitting bugs. The upgrade won't go smoothly and I have to engage support. These things happen when you upgrade, it's not the end of the world, but from a stability point of view, the only time I've so far, is during upgrades.It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding.More private MIB object support, such as WAN optimisation performance and wireless, would be helpful.Configuration management: In configuration management it would be helpful if it would backup configuration files (running and start-up configuration) for devices. (Not sure if this is already available in the latest version).

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The cost of some of these products are a little cost prohibitive, which is unfortunate. We have to find lower cost solutions for some of the things that we have to pull in. For the most part, CA has capabilities in pretty much everything that you would need. You just have to figure out where are you going to spend the most money for what you have to actually get done. You can do all these things but, which ones do you have to do? And that's hard to choose sometimes because you want to do them all.It’s a great tool, but an expensive one. Learn how to use it properly.It is very pricey. With the current trend of enterprises moving towards cheaper and more modern looking solutions like ManageEngine, SevOne, ServicePilot, and Paesller.

Read more »

We now feel the pricing is a good value. Previously we had a just a normal license but now we've got an Enterprise license. Since the Enterprise, it's been a lot better value. We did think it was pretty expensive before, but with the Enterprise license it's almost less than half that price. If you have a number of accounts within the organization that use Statseeker, I would suggest get the Enterprise license.One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich.Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive.Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited.

Read more »

Ca spectrum vs. statseeker report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Spectrum vs Statseeker and others in Network Monitoring Software.
269,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
23,341
Comparisons
5,506
Reviews
57
Followers
1,223
Avg. Rating
8.4
Views
2,070
Comparisons
971
Reviews
11
Followers
807
Avg. Rating
8.7
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
3gaoi2h254k0canb4hxj 400x400
Compared 14% of the time.
Ibm
Compared 10% of the time.
See more CA Spectrum competitors »
Solarwinds
Compared 23% of the time.
3gaoi2h254k0canb4hxj 400x400
Compared 15% of the time.
Paessler
Compared 12% of the time.
See more Statseeker competitors »
Website/Video
Website/VideoCA Technologies
  • Vendor 6987 screenshot 1524992460
Statseeker
  • Vendor 29444 screenshot 1521913531
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewCA Spectrum can enable your organization to discover, optimize and improve its infrastructure and the business services running on top of it. By delivering large-enterprise scalability, robust features and superior root cause analysis, this solution can help your organization effectively manage its dynamic, complex IT infrastructure including physical, virtual and cloud environments as well as network virtualization. Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.
OFFER
Learn more about CA Spectrum
Learn more about Statseeker
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersNational Informatics Centre India, Banese, Olympus, AlphaServe Technologies, SicrediWith active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
16%
Healthcare Company
12%
Insurance Company
9%
Transportation Company
7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
24%
Comms Service Provider
22%
Retailer
10%
Healthcare Company
7%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider
33%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
11%
Construction Company
11%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
12%
Midsize Enterprise
15%
Large Enterprise
73%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
18%
Midsize Enterprise
23%
Large Enterprise
58%
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise
20%
Large Enterprise
80%
Ca spectrum vs. statseeker report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Spectrum vs Statseeker and others in Network Monitoring Software.
Download now
269,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email