We performed a comparison between i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management and Symantec Siteminder based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management."The solution has high support capability."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable is that they are open to connecting with any token. For example, a year ago, we were looking for a soft token, and we started to look for alternatives. They are open to connecting with any token that we looking for."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Pros →
"Symantec Siteminder Is both scalable and stable."
"Ease of use is very good, for administrating it. It's very well known."
"We almost never have outages nor see slowdowns."
"It provides the breadth and the width to provide solutions for the different kinds of technologies which we have."
"Federation is valuable, for sure, because we have a lot of third-party vendors that we need to integrate with, and this is a turnkey solution in some ways."
"It has the ability to authenticate and authorize users. It is the main feature for our security."
"The single sign-on is the solution's most valuable feature"
"It is reliable."
"The user interface is not quite good and easy to use. There are a lot of menus, and the look and feel is not modern like a modern app."
"The tool needs to improve its cloud capability."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Cons →
"CA has reporting at the moment. With the reporting, every particular segmented product has a reporting engine. I would like to see centralized reporting for all of them together."
"Better documentation. I went through some sessions on single sign-on for version 12.7."
"We would like to the OAuth be more stable, more issues being fixed rather than not."
"As we are moving in to the mobility space, this is where we really see SiteMinder and their other product really come together to provide a solution base to a different area where the IoT is coming, the different business communications are happening. All of those things require authentication and we really want to see this product grow into that role."
"The main thing is we do not have the traceability and good monitoring that CA can provide us to capture problems when they occur."
"We are finding some compatibility issues. We're still working with CA on them."
"I think they need to integrate some of the newer types of authentication into the product. I'm not seeing the innovation when it comes to biometrics in the product."
"I'd like to see a rework of the user directory configuration."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is ranked 24th in Access Management with 2 reviews while Symantec Siteminder is ranked 17th in Access Management with 69 reviews. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is rated 8.0, while Symantec Siteminder is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management writes "A stable and scalable solution with reasonable pricing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Siteminder writes "Easy to implement and customize and very stable". i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, whereas Symantec Siteminder is most compared with PingFederate, ForgeRock, Okta Workforce Identity, PingID and PingAccess.
See our list of best Access Management vendors and best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.