CA SSO vs. OneLogin
CA SSO is ranked 1st in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 35 reviews vs OneLogin which is ranked 6th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 3 reviews. The top reviewer of CA SSO writes "The flexibility helped us meet the requirements of our customer". The top reviewer of OneLogin writes "The self-service password resets is one of the most valuable features". CA SSO is most compared with Okta, IBM Tivoli Access Manager and Auth0. OneLogin is most compared with Okta, Auth0 and Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium. See our CA SSO vs. OneLogin report.
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review | |||||
|
| ||||
 Find out what your peers are saying about CA SSO vs. OneLogin and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). 295,762 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||||
Quotes From Members Comparing CA SSO vs. OneLogin
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:Pros | |
The most valuable feature is that it meets the requirements of the customer. You have a lot of features in the product. Every product has them, but the question is, are these products going to meet the requirement of the customer? I liked the debugging part. There are only two files (trace file and log file) that you need to look into while performing debugging, and the logs give you the exact info on where and what needs to be fixed. You can quickly deploy the entire product with a basic config within couple of hours. It has considerably reduced the amount of time that new users would take to join into the organization. Previously, it was a lengthy, manual process because it's a very secure environment, where they need to verify the user before they can actually grant him a user-ID and password. Integrating with the built-in custom application, and exposing CA Single Sign On to the internet, we were able to get the employees onboard. The time that we gained was: previously it would generally take from four to eight weeks for each employee, we brought it to one to two days. The most valuable feature is the Federation part of Single Sign On, which is customizable and is easily integrated with any customer application or any third party application. Federation is valuable, for sure, because we have a lot of third-party vendors that we need to integrate with, and this is a turnkey solution in some ways. The Directory is secure. It's our user store, and it's important to keep our members safe. The product does well with that. If you look at our organization, and really all financial institutions, we have a lot of legacy apps. So it really helps to get Single Sign-On. | Documentation. Ease of integration with AD. |
Cons | |
CA has reporting at the moment. With the reporting, every particular segmented product has a reporting engine. I would like to see centralized reporting for all of them together. The GUIs are not very clear, especially when integrating with other products from CA. The Federation part of CA Single Sign On, it's a bit complex to implement because it involves the SSL certificates, exchange of certificates, and lot of technical details. The documentation misses some important parts of this, so that's the reason it took some time for us to go live. I think they need to integrate some of the newer types of authentication into the product. I'm not seeing the innovation when it comes to biometrics in the product. They need to make configurations easier, and not have the engineer having to guess what will happen when he changes a particular setting. The initial setup was complex, painful. But that is to be expected of any new setup. When you're a big bank like us, any kind of migration to a new product is hard. I expect it to be painful, and it was painful. But it's not something that you can avoid. I would like to see a move towards the newer technologies, which is what we are doing right now. I think that's in the roadmap that's coming, in the 12.8 and 14 releases, but we would like to have it sooner than later. The main thing is we do not have the traceability and good monitoring that CA can provide us to capture problems when they occur. | having a RESTful implementation instead of RPC would have been more desirable. More off-hour support. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
CA solutions are generally expensive but for the customer the ROI is big. I recommend conducting a PoC on every available product before choose one. The price is quite comparable to the other enterprise-level solutions in that market. | Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs. 295,762 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||
Ranking | ||
| RANKING | Views 12,994 Comparisons 1,821 Reviews 35 Followers 734 Avg. Rating 7.8 | Views 9,384 Comparisons 6,264 Reviews 3 Followers 460 Avg. Rating 9.3 |
Top Comparisons | ||
| Top Comparisons |  Compared 46% of the time.  Compared 14% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time. | Compared 51% of the time. Compared 11% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time. |
Also Known As | ||
| Also Known As | Single Sign-On, SiteMinder | |
Website/Video | ||
| Website/Video | CA Technologies | OneLogin |
Overview  | ||
| Overview | CA Single Sign-On provides secure single sign-on and flexible access management to applications and Web services on-premise, in the cloud, from a mobile device or a partner’s site. For over a decade, CA Single Sign-On has been a leader in enterprise-class secure Web single sign-on and identity federation, providing a comprehensive solution that addresses access to applications and cloud services. CA Single Sign-On delivers unparalleled reliability, availability, scalability and manageability. | OneLogin Simplifies Identity and Access Management for a More Efficient, Secure Enterprise. Empower employees, customers and partners with secure access to your cloud and company apps on any device. Transform your enterprise security and centralize control of users, apps and devices. |
OFFER | ||
Learn more about CA SSO | Learn more about OneLogin | |
Sample Customers | ||
| Sample Customers | British Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and Simeo | AAA, Pandora, Yelp, Zendesk, Stanford, Hult, Pacific Life, One Medical Group, RichRelevance, CloudBees, Cleveland Institute of Art, reed.co.uk, Awana, Analyte, Vision Critical, Yammer |
Top Industries | ||
| Top Industries | REVIEWERS 43% 9% 9% 6% VISITORS READING REVIEWS 21% 11% 11% 9% | VISITORS READING REVIEWS 28% 14% 9% 9% |
Company Size | ||
| Company Size | REVIEWERS 3% 3% 94% VISITORS READING REVIEWS 11% 22% 67% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about CA SSO vs. OneLogin and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).
295,762 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also CA SSO Reviews, OneLogin Reviews, and our list of Best Single Sign-On (SSO) Companies.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile
and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
- Unlimited access to 21000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign in.
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
- Unlimited access to 21000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign In.