CA SSO vs OneLogin

CA SSO is ranked 1st in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 35 reviews vs OneLogin which is ranked 6th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 3 reviews. The top reviewer of CA SSO writes "The flexibility helped us meet the requirements of our customer". The top reviewer of OneLogin writes "The self-service password resets is one of the most valuable features". CA SSO is most compared with Okta, IBM Tivoli Access Manager and Auth0. OneLogin is most compared with Okta, Auth0 and Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium. See our CA SSO vs OneLogin report.

CA SSO

OneLogin

18382

CA SSO

Based on 35 reviews.

29269

OneLogin

Based on 3 reviews.

Most Helpful Review

Amlan Sahoo

Systems-Engineer at a tech services company

You can quickly deploy the entire product with a basic config. However, the GUIs are not very clear.

The product was just for client demo purposes. There was no deployment onsite.

Tunde Oni Daniel Cissp,Crisc,Gcpm,Gpen,Gwapt

Director of Information Security at a manufacturing company

Integration with Active Directory and connector support are valuable features.

It eased SaaS selection, adoption and integration.

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CA SSO vs OneLogin and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).

Download now

287,741 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing CA SSO vs OneLogin

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
I liked the debugging part. There are only two files (trace file and log file) that you need to look into while performing debugging, and the logs give you the exact info on where and what needs to be fixed.You can quickly deploy the entire product with a basic config within couple of hours.The most valuable feature is that it meets the requirements of the customer. You have a lot of features in the product. Every product has them, but the question is, are these products going to meet the requirement of the customer?It has considerably reduced the amount of time that new users would take to join into the organization. Previously, it was a lengthy, manual process because it's a very secure environment, where they need to verify the user before they can actually grant him a user-ID and password. Integrating with the built-in custom application, and exposing CA Single Sign On to the internet, we were able to get the employees onboard. The time that we gained was: previously it would generally take from four to eight weeks for each employee, we brought it to one to two days.The most valuable feature is the Federation part of Single Sign On, which is customizable and is easily integrated with any customer application or any third party application.Federation is valuable, for sure, because we have a lot of third-party vendors that we need to integrate with, and this is a turnkey solution in some ways.The Directory is secure. It's our user store, and it's important to keep our members safe. The product does well with that.If you look at our organization, and really all financial institutions, we have a lot of legacy apps. So it really helps to get Single Sign-On. Read more »	Documentation.Ease of integration with AD. Read more »
Cons
The GUIs are not very clear, especially when integrating with other products from CA.CA has reporting at the moment. With the reporting, every particular segmented product has a reporting engine. I would like to see centralized reporting for all of them together.The Federation part of CA Single Sign On, it's a bit complex to implement because it involves the SSL certificates, exchange of certificates, and lot of technical details. The documentation misses some important parts of this, so that's the reason it took some time for us to go live.I think they need to integrate some of the newer types of authentication into the product. I'm not seeing the innovation when it comes to biometrics in the product.They need to make configurations easier, and not have the engineer having to guess what will happen when he changes a particular setting.The initial setup was complex, painful. But that is to be expected of any new setup. When you're a big bank like us, any kind of migration to a new product is hard. I expect it to be painful, and it was painful. But it's not something that you can avoid.I would like to see a move towards the newer technologies, which is what we are doing right now. I think that's in the roadmap that's coming, in the 12.8 and 14 releases, but we would like to have it sooner than later.The main thing is we do not have the traceability and good monitoring that CA can provide us to capture problems when they occur. Read more »	having a RESTful implementation instead of RPC would have been more desirable.More off-hour support. Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
I recommend conducting a PoC on every available product before choose one.CA solutions are generally expensive but for the customer the ROI is big.The price is quite comparable to the other enterprise-level solutions in that market. Read more »	Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions. Read more »

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 287,741 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING	1st out of 31 In Single Sign-On (SSO) Views 12,697 Comparisons 1,823 Reviews 35 Followers 900 Avg. Rating 7.8	6th out of 31 In Single Sign-On (SSO) Views 8,915 Comparisons 6,358 Reviews 3 Followers 623 Avg. Rating 9.3
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons	Okta vs. CA SSO Compared 46% of the time. IBM Tivoli Access Manager vs. CA SSO Compared 13% of the time. Auth0 vs. CA SSO Compared 8% of the time. See more CA SSO competitors »	Okta vs. OneLogin Compared 52% of the time. Auth0 vs. OneLogin Compared 11% of the time. Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium vs. OneLogin Compared 6% of the time. See more OneLogin competitors »

Also Known As
Also Known As	Single Sign-On, SiteMinder
Website/Video
Website/Video	CA Technologies	OneLogin
Overview
Overview	CA Single Sign-On provides secure single sign-on and flexible access management to applications and Web services on-premise, in the cloud, from a mobile device or a partner’s site. For over a decade, CA Single Sign-On has been a leader in enterprise-class secure Web single sign-on and identity federation, providing a comprehensive solution that addresses access to applications and cloud services. CA Single Sign-On delivers unparalleled reliability, availability, scalability and manageability. Take an Assessment	OneLogin Simplifies Identity and Access Management for a More Efficient, Secure Enterprise. Empower employees, customers and partners with secure access to your cloud and company apps on any device. Transform your enterprise security and centralize control of users, apps and devices.
OFFER
Learn more about CA SSO Learn More	Learn more about OneLogin Learn More
Sample Customers
Sample Customers	British Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and Simeo	AAA, Pandora, Yelp, Zendesk, Stanford, Hult, Pacific Life, One Medical Group, RichRelevance, CloudBees, Cleveland Institute of Art, reed.co.uk, Awana, Analyte, Vision Critical, Yammer
Top Industries
Top Industries	REVIEWERS Financial Services Firm 43% Comms Service Provider 9% Healthcare Company 9% Retailer 6% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Financial Services Firm 21% Manufacturing Company 11% Healthcare Company 11% Retailer 9%	No Data Available
Company Size
Company Size	REVIEWERS Small Business 3% Midsize Enterprise 3% Large Enterprise 94% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Small Business 11% Midsize Enterprise 22% Large Enterprise 67%	No Data Available

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CA SSO vs OneLogin and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).

Download now

287,741 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See also CA SSO Reviews, OneLogin Reviews, and our list of Best Single Sign-On (SSO) Companies.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.