CA SSO vs OneLogin

CA SSO is ranked 1st in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 34 reviews vs OneLogin which is ranked 6th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 3 reviews. The top reviewer of CA SSO writes "The flexibility helped us meet the requirements of our customer". The top reviewer of OneLogin writes "The self-service password resets is one of the most valuable features". CA SSO is most compared with Okta, IBM Tivoli Access Manager and Auth0. OneLogin is most compared with Okta, Auth0 and Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium. See our CA SSO vs OneLogin report.

CA SSO

OneLogin

18382

CA SSO

Based on 34 reviews.

29269

OneLogin

Based on 3 reviews.

Most Helpful Review

JosephLaVigne

Security Engineer at a financial services firm

All of our applications get a point, click, and you are in, while we increase security at the same time

People do not have to remember 35 to 40 usernames and passwords. They have a link to go to their page that they need to work on, and it is there.... Read more »

Tunde Oni Daniel Cissp,Crisc,Gcpm,Gpen,Gwapt

Director of Information Security at a manufacturing company

Integration with Active Directory and connector support are valuable features.

It eased SaaS selection, adoption and integration.

Ca sso vs. onelogin report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CA SSO vs OneLogin and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).

Download now

269,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing CA SSO vs OneLogin

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is that it meets the requirements of the customer. You have a lot of features in the product. Every product has them, but the question is, are these products going to meet the requirement of the customer?It has considerably reduced the amount of time that new users would take to join into the organization. Previously, it was a lengthy, manual process because it's a very secure environment, where they need to verify the user before they can actually grant him a user-ID and password. Integrating with the built-in custom application, and exposing CA Single Sign On to the internet, we were able to get the employees onboard. The time that we gained was: previously it would generally take from four to eight weeks for each employee, we brought it to one to two days.The most valuable feature is the Federation part of Single Sign On, which is customizable and is easily integrated with any customer application or any third party application.Federation is valuable, for sure, because we have a lot of third-party vendors that we need to integrate with, and this is a turnkey solution in some ways.The Directory is secure. It's our user store, and it's important to keep our members safe. The product does well with that.If you look at our organization, and really all financial institutions, we have a lot of legacy apps. So it really helps to get Single Sign-On.Ease of use is very good, for administrating it. It's very well known.It has the ability to authenticate and authorize users. It is the main feature for our security. Read more »	Documentation.Ease of integration with AD. Read more »
Cons
CA has reporting at the moment. With the reporting, every particular segmented product has a reporting engine. I would like to see centralized reporting for all of them together.The Federation part of CA Single Sign On, it's a bit complex to implement because it involves the SSL certificates, exchange of certificates, and lot of technical details. The documentation misses some important parts of this, so that's the reason it took some time for us to go live.I think they need to integrate some of the newer types of authentication into the product. I'm not seeing the innovation when it comes to biometrics in the product.They need to make configurations easier, and not have the engineer having to guess what will happen when he changes a particular setting.The initial setup was complex, painful. But that is to be expected of any new setup. When you're a big bank like us, any kind of migration to a new product is hard. I expect it to be painful, and it was painful. But it's not something that you can avoid.I would like to see a move towards the newer technologies, which is what we are doing right now. I think that's in the roadmap that's coming, in the 12.8 and 14 releases, but we would like to have it sooner than later.The main thing is we do not have the traceability and good monitoring that CA can provide us to capture problems when they occur.All the problems that we reported actually have never been resolved. We could not capture enough information for CA to be able to debug the problem. Read more »	having a RESTful implementation instead of RPC would have been more desirable.More off-hour support. Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
CA solutions are generally expensive but for the customer the ROI is big.The price is quite comparable to the other enterprise-level solutions in that market. Read more »	Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions. Read more »

Download Free Report Find out what your peers are saying about CA SSO vs OneLogin and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Download now 269,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING	1st out of 31 In Single Sign-On (SSO) Views 12,166 Comparisons 1,743 Reviews 34 Followers 1,057 Avg. Rating 7.8	6th out of 31 In Single Sign-On (SSO) Views 8,137 Comparisons 6,450 Reviews 3 Followers 713 Avg. Rating 9.3
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons	Okta vs. CA SSO Compared 44% of the time. IBM Tivoli Access Manager vs. CA SSO Compared 12% of the time. Auth0 vs. CA SSO Compared 8% of the time. See more CA SSO competitors »	Okta vs. OneLogin Compared 52% of the time. Auth0 vs. OneLogin Compared 10% of the time. Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium vs. OneLogin Compared 5% of the time. See more OneLogin competitors »

Also Known As
Also Known As	Single Sign-On, SiteMinder
Website/Video
Website/Video	CA Technologies	OneLogin
Overview
Overview	CA Single Sign-On provides secure single sign-on and flexible access management to applications and Web services on-premise, in the cloud, from a mobile device or a partner’s site. For over a decade, CA Single Sign-On has been a leader in enterprise-class secure Web single sign-on and identity federation, providing a comprehensive solution that addresses access to applications and cloud services. CA Single Sign-On delivers unparalleled reliability, availability, scalability and manageability. Take an Assessment	OneLogin Simplifies Identity and Access Management for a More Efficient, Secure Enterprise. Empower employees, customers and partners with secure access to your cloud and company apps on any device. Transform your enterprise security and centralize control of users, apps and devices.
OFFER
Learn more about CA SSO Learn More	Learn more about OneLogin Learn More
Sample Customers
Sample Customers	British Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and Simeo	AAA, Pandora, Yelp, Zendesk, Stanford, Hult, Pacific Life, One Medical Group, RichRelevance, CloudBees, Cleveland Institute of Art, reed.co.uk, Awana, Analyte, Vision Critical, Yammer
Top Industries
Top Industries	REVIEWERS Financial Services Firm 41% Aerospace/Defense Firm 7% Insurance Company 7% Retailer 7% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Financial Services Firm 20% Manufacturing Company 12% Healthcare Company 12% Media Company 10%	No Data Available
Company Size
Company Size	REVIEWERS Small Business 3% Midsize Enterprise 3% Large Enterprise 94% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Small Business 11% Midsize Enterprise 24% Large Enterprise 65%	No Data Available

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CA SSO vs OneLogin and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).

Download now

269,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See also CA SSO Reviews, OneLogin Reviews, and our list of Best Single Sign-On (SSO) Companies.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.