Compare CA SSO vs. WSO2 Identity Server

CA SSO is ranked 4th in Access Management with 7 reviews while WSO2 Identity Server is ranked 11th in Access Management with 2 reviews. CA SSO is rated 8.2, while WSO2 Identity Server is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CA SSO writes "The flexibility helped us meet the requirements of our customer". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Identity Server writes "A stable solution for single sign-on and role-based permissions". CA SSO is most compared with Okta, Ping Identity and Oracle Access Manager, whereas WSO2 Identity Server is most compared with OpenIAM, ForgeRock and SailPoint IdentityIQ. See our CA SSO vs. WSO2 Identity Server report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CA SSO Logo
3,982 views|2,088 comparisons
WSO2 Identity Server Logo
2,088 views|1,562 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CA SSO vs. WSO2 Identity Server and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
384,147 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is that it meets the requirements of the customer. You have a lot of features in the product. Every product has them, but the question is, are these products going to meet the requirement of the customer?I liked the debugging part. There are only two files (trace file and log file) that you need to look into while performing debugging, and the logs give you the exact info on where and what needs to be fixed.You can quickly deploy the entire product with a basic config within couple of hours.It has considerably reduced the amount of time that new users would take to join into the organization. Previously, it was a lengthy, manual process because it's a very secure environment, where they need to verify the user before they can actually grant him a user-ID and password. Integrating with the built-in custom application, and exposing CA Single Sign On to the internet, we were able to get the employees onboard. The time that we gained was: previously it would generally take from four to eight weeks for each employee, we brought it to one to two days.The most valuable feature is the Federation part of Single Sign On, which is customizable and is easily integrated with any customer application or any third party application.Federation is valuable, for sure, because we have a lot of third-party vendors that we need to integrate with, and this is a turnkey solution in some ways.The Directory is secure. It's our user store, and it's important to keep our members safe. The product does well with that.If you look at our organization, and really all financial institutions, we have a lot of legacy apps. So it really helps to get Single Sign-On.

Read more »

I would rate the solution's stability eight or nine out of ten.Comprehensive ecosystem.

Read more »

Cons
CA has reporting at the moment. With the reporting, every particular segmented product has a reporting engine. I would like to see centralized reporting for all of them together.The GUIs are not very clear, especially when integrating with other products from CA.The Federation part of CA Single Sign On, it's a bit complex to implement because it involves the SSL certificates, exchange of certificates, and lot of technical details. The documentation misses some important parts of this, so that's the reason it took some time for us to go live.I think they need to integrate some of the newer types of authentication into the product. I'm not seeing the innovation when it comes to biometrics in the product.They need to make configurations easier, and not have the engineer having to guess what will happen when he changes a particular setting.The initial setup was complex, painful. But that is to be expected of any new setup. When you're a big bank like us, any kind of migration to a new product is hard. I expect it to be painful, and it was painful. But it's not something that you can avoid.I would like to see a move towards the newer technologies, which is what we are doing right now. I think that's in the roadmap that's coming, in the 12.8 and 14 releases, but we would like to have it sooner than later.The main thing is we do not have the traceability and good monitoring that CA can provide us to capture problems when they occur.

Read more »

The high availability architecture has to be improved.I found the initial setup to be very complex.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
CA solutions are generally expensive but for the customer the ROI is big.I recommend conducting a PoC on every available product before choose one.

Read more »

We have to take their support, but that is a minimal charge if I'm comparing it to other identity managers.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
384,147 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
out of 26 in Access Management
Views
3,982
Comparisons
2,088
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
702
Avg. Rating
8.0
11th
out of 26 in Access Management
Views
2,088
Comparisons
1,562
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
595
Avg. Rating
7.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 52% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
Single Sign-On, SiteMinder
Learn
CA (A Broadcom Company)
WSO2
Overview

CA Single Sign-On provides secure single sign-on and flexible access management to applications and Web services on-premise, in the cloud, from a mobile device or a partner’s site. For over a decade, CA Single Sign-On has been a leader in enterprise-class secure Web single sign-on and identity federation, providing a comprehensive solution that addresses access to applications and cloud services.  CA Single Sign-On delivers unparalleled reliability, availability, scalability and manageability.

Take an Assessment

WSO2 Identity Server can be used to simplify identity and access management (IAM) related activities in the enterprise. The product is based on open standards and open source principles. WSO2 Identity Server comes with seamless, easy to use integration capabilities that help connect applications, user stores, directories and identity management systems.

Offer
Learn more about CA SSO
Learn more about WSO2 Identity Server
Sample Customers
British Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and SimeoNutanix, ELM, AlmavivA, BDigital, StubHub, M-creations, MedVision360
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm42%
Healthcare Company8%
Comms Service Provider8%
Aerospace/Defense Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company25%
Manufacturing Company18%
Retailer10%
Healthcare Company8%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CA SSO vs. WSO2 Identity Server and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
384,147 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email