CA Tape Encryption vs Trusted Access Manager for Z comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Tape Encryption and Trusted Access Manager for Z based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Broadcom, Precisely and others in Mainframe Security.
To learn more, read our detailed Mainframe Security Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
12th
out of 12 in Mainframe Security
Views
22
Comparisons
12
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
11th
out of 12 in Mainframe Security
Views
26
Comparisons
13
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Mainframe Security
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Broadcom, Precisely and others in Mainframe Security. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA Trusted Access Manager for Z
Learn More
Broadcom
Video Not Available
Overview

CA Tape Encryption is designed to be an innovative, flexible, easily implemented and comprehensive z/OS® tape encryption solution.
It helps ensure that your data is protected from breaches—even if your tapes fall into the wrong hands.

CA Tape Encryption helps you safeguard your sensitive data and automate full lifecycle key management. And it can be implemented without the need to purchase expensive and complex hardware.

With this mainframe solution, you can take steps to shield your company from fines, costly corrective processes and the negative publicity that can occur when personal and business-critical data are compromised. CA Tape Encryption helps you implement your security strategy while containing costs by:

Encrypting any application data as it is written to z/OS tape
Automating the cryptography process

Reduce the risk of insider threats, from malicious attacks to inadvertent threats.
CA Trusted Access Manager for Z helps deliver trusted systems and improve business efficiency through comprehensive privileged access management for your mainframe.

By eliminating the need for shared credentials, working with existing tools and producing forensics on all privileged user activity, you stay in complete control over mission-essential mainframe data.

Sample Customers
Rogers Communication, Sky, Gaumont, Vodafone Turkey
Neovera, Hill International, State of Louisiana, Acciona
Buyer's Guide
Mainframe Security
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Broadcom, Precisely and others in Mainframe Security. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA Tape Encryption is ranked 12th in Mainframe Security while Trusted Access Manager for Z is ranked 11th in Mainframe Security. CA Tape Encryption is rated 0.0, while Trusted Access Manager for Z is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CA Tape Encryption is most compared with , whereas Trusted Access Manager for Z is most compared with .

See our list of best Mainframe Security vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.