• Home
  • CA Testing Tools [EOL] vs. froglogic Squish

CA Testing Tools [EOL] vs froglogic Squish comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo

CA Testing Tools [EOL]

views| comparisons
froglogic Logo

froglogic Squish

Read 17 froglogic Squish reviews
3,426 views|1,686 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Testing Tools [EOL] and froglogic Squish based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use CA Testing Tools [EOL]?
AnirbanSarkar
Seamless functionality, plug-and-play installation, and highly reliable
This is a great tool to achieve automation for GUI regression testing. This has really reduced the entire release cycle time.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."
  • "It is expensive."

    • More froglogic Squish Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?
    Top Answer:It's quite expensive.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?
    Top Answer:I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool… more »
    Read all 9 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?
    Top Answer:I use Froglogic Squish for desktop UI testing.
    Read all 9 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Functional Testing Tools
    11th
    out of 47 in Test Automation Tools
    Views
    3,426
    Comparisons
    1,686
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    468
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Broadcom
    froglogic
    Overview
    Information Not Available

    Reliable GUI Test Automation that works.

    Use Squish for the automation of your cross-platform desktop, mobile, embedded and web GUI tests.

    Testing the user interface of today's applications is a very complex and error-prone task. Automating this task is challenging, but approached correctly very rewarding.

    The Squish GUI Tester is the tool of choice for several thousand companies worldwide and a 100% cross-platform tool, features

    • Desktop, Mobile, Embedded & Web Applications
    • include Qt, QtQuick, QML, Java, AWT, Swing, SWT, RCP, JavaFx, Windows, Mac, Tk, 4Js, iOS, Android, Embedded (Qt, Windows, Java) and Web, HTML5, Flex & JavaApplets.
    • testing on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, Unix. Mobile and Embedded testing on Android, iOS, embedded Linux and RTOSes such as QNX
    • Eclipse-based IDE
    • based object identification & Toolkit API Support
    • tests in your choice of Python, JavaScript, Perl, Ruby & Tcl
    • BDD tests with built-in (Gherkin) Feature File recording, playback & reporting
    • testing capabilities
    • complete with drill-down details, execution statistics and multiple output formats
    • options with many ALM and Continuous Integration tools for executing and managing tests as well as a complete command-line interface
    Sample Customers
    a.s.r.
    Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Testing Tools [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while froglogic Squish is ranked 11th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews. CA Testing Tools [EOL] is rated 0.0, while froglogic Squish is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of froglogic Squish writes "An all-in-one feature that can cross-cut from QT applications". CA Testing Tools [EOL] is most compared with , whereas froglogic Squish is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Ranorex Studio, Eggplant Test, Katalon Studio and Tricentis Tosca.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.