CA Testing Tools [EOL] vs OpenText Business Processing Testing comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Testing Tools [EOL] and OpenText Business Processing Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use CA Testing Tools [EOL]?
Srprogmagr567
Ranking
Unranked
In Functional Testing Tools
36th
Views
195
Comparisons
122
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing
Learn More
Overview
Information Not Available

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

Sample Customers
a.s.r.
Migros Bank AG
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise71%
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA Testing Tools [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked 36th in Functional Testing Tools. CA Testing Tools [EOL] is rated 0.0, while OpenText Business Processing Testing is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Processing Testing writes "Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool". CA Testing Tools [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText Business Processing Testing is most compared with .

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.