We performed a comparison between CA Testing Tools [EOL] and Parasoft SOAtest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.Earn 20 points
CA Testing Tools [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 30 reviews. CA Testing Tools [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Parasoft SOAtest is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Reliable with a good interface but uses too much memory". CA Testing Tools [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, Coverity, Polyspace Code Prover and Tricentis Tosca.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.