We performed a comparison between Datadog and DX Unified Infrastructure Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The most valuable aspects of the product include the APM and profiler."
"The biggest thing I liked was the combination of all the things - monitoring, log aggregation, and profiling."
"Datadog is easy to use and easy to deploy. It's a better solution compared to others on the market in terms of being budget friendly for our customers."
"Datadog is providing efficiency in the products we develop for the wireless device engineering department."
"It has enhanced the performance of my team."
"Datadog dashboards are pretty great."
"The monitoring functionality, in general, and tagging infrastructure are great."
"Datadog has clear dashboards and good documentation."
"It delivers our customers many metrics, so they may make decisions"
"It gives us visibility inside applications. It helps us to dig down and find the root cause of any issue within the network."
"The monitoring of the applications to let our business know when things are performing and that they're up and available."
"You can integrate clouds, hybrid infrastructure, and on-premise infrastructure into one product."
"We are able to go in and actually leverage the thick client for a nice easy drag and drop solution."
"It reduced cycles for a lot of quick out-of-the-box functionality. It also allowed us to get away from being stuck in SNMP, VTP V2, based off of agent deployment."
"This solution allows us to have an overview of the infrastructure and identify areas where the performance isn't optimal, or where upgrades could be carried out."
"Great customized dashboards and drill down reports with auto serve analytics."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"Lately, chat support has a longer waiting time."
"I would like better navigability across pages."
"The on-premise version is very difficult to upgrade."
"The product is quite complex, and there are so many features that I either didn't know about or wasn't sure how to use."
"When it comes to storing the logs with Datadog, I'm not sure why it costs so much to store gigabytes or terabytes of information when it's a fraction of the cost to do so myself."
"While the tool is robust with many different capabilities, users would greatly benefit from more examples in the documentation."
"The sheer amount of products that are included can be overwhelming."
"It would be ideal if the product offered a bit more monitoring from our dashboard."
"Within this product there are individual probes, and each of these probes doesn't always necessarily output the same kind of information into our database. So when we try to collect what's called QoS data, from one probe we might get a ton of information, lots of good stuff that we can use in our database, but then from another probe, we might not get so much or we might not be able to pull the things that we want to."
"The only challenge that I have with this solution is the reporting part. The users are not really comfortable with the kind of reports they are getting. Sometimes, they want to see reports in their own format. Customizing those reports with Jasper is not very easy. It could be because of the knowledge gap. If you have the knowledge of how Jasper can be configured to suit customer requirements in terms of reporting, it is good. There was a time a customer complained about one issue related to Netflow analysis. Broadcom has a separate model for that, but the customer wanted everything bundled together. It could also have IP management so that I am able to see or analyze IPs so that the IPs that are already in use don't get assigned."
"The UIM has no features through goods and services yet. "
"Stability."
"A useful feature to have would be automatic configuration per standard by new robots that check in for any particular customer."
"DX UIM's reporting and customization need to be improved."
"We want to see more investment in the UI and the dashboard."
"It would be good to implement views showing the aggregated status graphically."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datadog is ranked 1st in Cloud Monitoring Software with 137 reviews while DX Unified Infrastructure Management is ranked 25th in Cloud Monitoring Software with 120 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while DX Unified Infrastructure Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of DX Unified Infrastructure Management writes "Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics, whereas DX Unified Infrastructure Management is most compared with DX SaaS, DX Spectrum, SCOM, ManageEngine OpManager and SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor. See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors, best Network Monitoring Software vendors, and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.