We performed a comparison between CA Unified Communications Monitor and Statseeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"Good end-to-end monitoring"
"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."
"Device grouping is very easy, and you can discover thousands of devices in a few minutes."
"Key features for us are custom reporting, 95th Percentile, and trend lines."
"The most valuable features are scalability and reliability."
"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."
"It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages."
"The most important feature for us is the interface statistics, because our customer normally asks us for bandwidth utilization reports. Statseeker has very descriptive transmit and receive information."
"It also allows us to predict the capacity on WAN circuits, as well as other circuits, to help us plan for upgrading."
"The product simplifies monitoring by providing real-time alerts through a GUI dashboard, email and texts."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."
"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."
"The main issue I've seen, in the last six months to a year, is when I upgrade I seem to be hitting bugs. The upgrade won't go smoothly and I have to engage support. These things happen when you upgrade, it's not the end of the world, but from a stability point of view, the only time I've so far, is during upgrades."
"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."
"It would be very nice to have the Cisco ACI option included in the regular license."
"I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like."
"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."
"I would like to see a friendlier user interface in the administration tool."
"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."
"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."
Earn 20 points
CA Unified Communications Monitor is ranked 94th in Network Monitoring Software while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. CA Unified Communications Monitor is rated 6.6, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CA Unified Communications Monitor writes "Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". CA Unified Communications Monitor is most compared with , whereas Statseeker is most compared with Fortinet FortiSIEM.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
