We performed a comparison between CA Unified Communications Monitor and Tintri Global Center [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."Good end-to-end monitoring"
"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."
"The Tintri product line as a whole has freed up a lot of resources from constant administration of legacy enterprise storage."
"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."
"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."
"A better Tintri would be a "cheaper" one to get things started again."
CA Unified Communications Monitor is ranked 77th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Tintri Global Center [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. CA Unified Communications Monitor is rated 6.6, while Tintri Global Center [EOL] is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of CA Unified Communications Monitor writes "Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tintri Global Center [EOL] writes "Provides VM protection with scheduled snapshots and replication". CA Unified Communications Monitor is most compared with , whereas Tintri Global Center [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
