We performed a comparison between DX Unified Infrastructure Management and OpenText Operations Bridge based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The benefit is easy installation. Thus, the model approach of the product and out-of-the-box probes, which deliver direct value."
"Monitors the infrastructure asset and also monitors as an IT service."
"It is the foundation for our monitoring solution."
"The feature that we've found to be very helpful is the way the solution categorizes the devices to identify groups, groups of devices and clusters. This allows us to be aware of their position within the topology."
"Another division handed us the opportunity to monitor their solutions as written, and UIM was very useful for that."
"The monitoring of the applications to let our business know when things are performing and that they're up and available."
"Technical support is great."
"It gives us visibility inside applications. It helps us to dig down and find the root cause of any issue within the network."
"The preloaded rules and ways to monitor your systems are a must."
"I find the Micro Focus Operations Bridge dashboard valuable, including its instrument analysis and anomaly control features that help indicate root causes and problems with your infrastructure."
"The Performance Manager provides great insight into our systems' performance."
"The broad integration possibilities, I'd say, with any kind of product, are probably the most valuable feature."
"Purely, its flexibility is the most valuable aspect. It is hugely configurable."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward. It's not complex at all."
"The most valuable feature is that everything can be consolidated into one dashboard."
"From our monitoring perspective or from a visibility perspective, HPE UCMDB is a must have. It's an amazing piece of software."
"I would like to see auditability. We've built our own audit functionality to ensure that every CI has the desired model configuration applied to it. And we run that on a daily basis. If that became part of the product, I think it might be a little bit less intensive in terms of resource, because we're doing it with scripts."
"I'm very happy with DX Unified Infrastructure Management, but what could be improved is its user interface because currently, it has many wide spaces. All the information you need is in DX Unified Infrastructure Management, and it's a reliable tool, and though that's more important than the gaps in the user interface being smaller or wider, those gaps still need some improvement. I know the team is working on it. My company had some backend problems with DX Unified Infrastructure Management in the past that have now been solved. The setup for the tool also needs improvement because it's complex. Another room for improvement in DX Unified Infrastructure Management is its technical support because it's sometimes not as knowledgeable or responsive. What I'm suggesting to be added to the tool is an open-standard ELK Elastic-based database where you can put in all data, so that you can use the data in other systems as well."
"The UIM has no features through goods and services yet. "
"It needs a little bit more functionality in the Admin Console."
"We would like to see automatic network topology."
"The dashboards need to be improved."
"Reporting capability can be improved especially when it comes to availability."
"We would like the navigation of this solution to be more user friendly for our system administrators."
"The pricing is a bit expensive for smaller companies."
"Installing and upgrading the HPOM and Operations Agent software is not always easy and the process can be quite fragile. Once it is running, it is very quick and stable, but an upgrade can quite easily break something or terminate unexpectedly."
"pology-based event correlation does not work well with NNM events."
"What needs improvement in Micro Focus Operations Bridge is its resource heaviness because you need many resources to deploy and support it. It's a good solution for larger organizations, but for small businesses, not so much."
"Implementation could be improved."
"I know that in the next version, X1005, they're moving to more graphical overviews, which should help our senior managers."
"The initial setup of this tool is complex for people who lack experience with it."
"The solution is overall "heavy", requiring multiple servers, even without HA."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
DX Unified Infrastructure Management is ranked 25th in Cloud Monitoring Software with 120 reviews while OpenText Operations Bridge is ranked 35th in Cloud Monitoring Software with 44 reviews. DX Unified Infrastructure Management is rated 8.2, while OpenText Operations Bridge is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of DX Unified Infrastructure Management writes "Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Operations Bridge writes "Good event correlation capabilities, promotes a self-service approach to monitoring". DX Unified Infrastructure Management is most compared with DX SaaS, DX Spectrum, SCOM, ManageEngine OpManager and SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, whereas OpenText Operations Bridge is most compared with SCOM, OpsRamp, BMC Helix Monitor, Splunk Enterprise Security and IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus. See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. OpenText Operations Bridge report.
See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
