CA XCOM Data Transport vs Flux comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
1,130 views|842 comparisons
Flux Logo
86 views|75 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA XCOM Data Transport and Flux based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use CA XCOM Data Transport?
Anonymous User
Ranking
Views
1,130
Comparisons
842
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
86
Comparisons
75
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Get automated high-performance, secure movement of mission-critical data and files.
CA XCOM Data Transport’s reliable delivery and automated transmission recovery features help maintain data integrity throughout the processing environment while supporting enterprise security standards with robust data encryption and auditing capabilities.

Flexible, integrated solution to meet highly complex processing needs with job scheduling, batch processor, and managed file transfer.

Flux automates batch processes into comprehensive workflows. Flux's batch job scheduling runs reports, triggers database jobs, runs Java code, executes ETL processes, transfers files, and runs command lines or shell scripts. Flux integrates batch job scheduling, managed file transfer, database queries and stored procedures, web services, and error handling to automate your batch job scheduling needs.

Sample Customers
Greenchoice, R+V Versicherung, Italian Interior Ministry, Vodafone Turkey
MetLife DHL Express The Clearing House Payments Company ADP Bank of New York Mellon Conway, Inc Carnegie Mellon University
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm39%
Manufacturing Company11%
Insurance Company8%
Computer Software Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm23%
Manufacturing Company17%
Computer Software Company11%
Healthcare Company8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise77%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise81%
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA XCOM Data Transport is ranked 16th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while Flux is ranked 35th in Managed File Transfer (MFT). CA XCOM Data Transport is rated 0.0, while Flux is rated 10.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Flux writes "User-friendly, extensible product with great customer support. Would like better support for multiple workflows". CA XCOM Data Transport is most compared with CompleteFTP, Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer, IBM Sterling File Gateway and TIBCO Managed File Transfer, whereas Flux is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.