Compare Cadence Incisive Palladium vs. Synopsys Saber

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
351
Comparisons
300
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
290
Comparisons
198
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
PalladiumSaber, Synopsys Magma, Synopys Innovator
Learn
Cadence Incisive
Synopsys
Video Not Available
Overview

The Incisive Enterprise Palladium series of accelerators/emulators is a key component of the Incisive functional verification platform. It provides the performance needed to verify embedded software and HW/SW interactions.Palladium systems offer verification speeds of 100 to 1,000,000x faster than RTL simulation alone, fast bring-uptime and compile times in minutes. Palladium systems also offer several use models with multi-user capability, remote access, hard and soft IP, and testing with live data through Incisive SpeedBridge rate adaptors

Specializing in the design, development and delivery of cost-effective cloud-based applications, addressing the challenges of small to mid-sized businesses.
Offer
Learn more about Cadence Incisive Palladium
Learn more about Synopsys Saber
Sample Customers
NetSpeed, Fujitsu, SharpEADS Innovation Works
Cadence Incisive Palladium is ranked 2nd in Electronic Design Automation while Synopsys Saber is ranked 3rd in Electronic Design Automation. Cadence Incisive Palladium is rated 0.0, while Synopsys Saber is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Cadence Incisive Palladium is most compared with Mentor Graphics MODELSIM, whereas Synopsys Saber is most compared with Mentor Graphics MODELSIM.

See our list of best Electronic Design Automation vendors.

We monitor all Electronic Design Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.