Compare Cambium vs. Cisco Wireless WAN

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cambium Logo
1,168 views|1,012 comparisons
Cisco Wireless WAN Logo
238 views|120 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Cambium? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cambium vs. Cisco Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The claim management feature is exceedingly simple.""The initial setup is easy to handle. It's quite simple."

More Cambium Pros »

"The ease of management is the solution's most valuable feature.""I like how the look and feel of the product is standardized to match other Cisco solutions.""This stability is one of the major reasons to stick with this product.""The program is very stable.""The initial setup was really easy and straightforward.""Mobile anchoring and graphic user interface are helpful features.""This is the most stable product in the market.""Granularity of standardization and technical controls."

More Cisco Wireless WAN Pros »

Cons
"Pricing tends to be higher than its competitors.""The solution needs to add an LTE solution and/or something in 3.5GHz."

More Cambium Cons »

"Pricing is very high with Cisco products. It's something that many people complain about. They should work to make it more affordable.""The pricing could be improved in future releases. It's quite expensive.""The worst thing about the Cisco controllers is that they only have two ports.""The integration support technology should be improved.""There is no centralized management for multiple wireless control deployments or a user tracking feature.""The reporting feature needs improvement, especially adding information with regards to availability uptime.""Include more managing features within the product, rather than having to purchase them as extras.""The cloud interoperability needs improvement."

More Cisco Wireless WAN Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It is very expensive.""Cisco is more expensive than other solutions.""This is a very expensive solution but there are no additional costs.""It was a one time fee and there are no costs in addition to this."

More Cisco Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
5th
out of 11 in Wireless WAN
Views
1,168
Comparisons
1,012
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
443
Avg. Rating
10.0
3rd
out of 11 in Wireless WAN
Views
238
Comparisons
120
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
457
Avg. Rating
8.1
Popular Comparisons
Compared 63% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Also Known As
Cambium PMP Series, Cambium ePMP Series
Learn
Cambium Networks
Cisco
Overview

Cambium Networks is a leading global provider of wireless broadband solutions that connect the unconnected. Through its extensive portfolio of reliable, scalable and secure WiFi and wireless broadband point-to-point (PTP) and point-to-multipoint (PMP) platforms managed by cloud-based software, Cambium Networks makes it possible for all service providers; enterprises; governmental and military agencies; oil, gas and utility companies; Internet service providers; and public safety networks to build powerful communications networks, reach users from 200 kilometers across mountain tops down to the last meter to their devices and intelligently manage their infrastructure through end-to-end network visibility and actionable analytics.

Cisco Wireless WAN can help your business expand rapidly while making critical applications and services available when and where needed. Your business can run applications such as interactive video and TelePresence on a primary 4G LTE WWAN link, which is 10 to 15 times faster and 5 times lower latency than 3G.
Offer
Learn more about Cambium
Learn more about Cisco Wireless WAN
Sample Customers
Wireless Etc, Agricultural Technology Company in Brazil, Redfox, SKYNET, HOUSTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPLEBEE’SAegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider50%
Computer Software Company13%
Manufacturing Company6%
Construction Company4%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company13%
Healthcare Company13%
Pharma/Biotech Company13%
Comms Service Provider13%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise31%
Large Enterprise44%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cambium vs. Cisco Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cambium is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 2 reviews while Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 11 reviews. Cambium is rated 10.0, while Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cambium writes "Stable with good performance and an easy initial setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "Enables you to control everything, every technology within the wireless arena and has good granularity". Cambium is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Ruckus Wireless WAN and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN, whereas Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiExtender. See our Cambium vs. Cisco Wireless WAN report.

See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.