We performed a comparison between Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and HPE Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One could say that Cambium is a scalable solution."
"Cambium Networks' PowerMax feature has been particularly beneficial for WAN connectivity, offering superior coverage compared to other solutions. The standout feature of Cambium Networks for me is its extensive coverage area."
"What I find valuable is the fact that you don't need to purchase any license. Basically you just get the hardware for the access points, configure an IP and connect it with a switch."
"It excels in challenging environments and adverse weather conditions, maintaining high performance without any impact on the link quality."
"The feature that I really liked is the mesh feature. Currently, we are in quarantine, and the request of home users is that they need to cover the whole house or the whole indoor house. Mesh solution works really nice in Cambium environment. Being able to set up access points in advance is a good feature. It lets you set up the whole environment in your lab or any other place before deploying the access points."
"It is easy to deploy and has many specialists to help us handle complicated processes."
"It is easy to deploy, and it is not that complicated. There are a lot of systems that are very complicated, and they require a special kind of training. Their response is also very slow, especially with the Chinese vendors, but with Cambium, we have not faced any issues. Everything is going well in terms of cooperation from Cambium. We are happy with them, their services, their cooperation, and their quick response. They are just amazing."
"The claim management feature is exceedingly simple."
"What's most valuable in HPE Wireless WAN is that it works fine for customers with existing HPE controllers."
"The most important is that the solution is stable."
"Setting up the solution initially is very easy."
"HPE Wireless is easy to use. Integration is not an issue. It is easy to integrate HPE Wireless with any operating system and other brands of switches."
"It is a new product backed by HPE's expertise in networking and telecommunications. We can also work with 3Com products."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."
"The reliability is good."
"The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is stable but sometimes the 2.4 gigahertz network is sometimes not as stable as the 5 gigahertz. The 5 gigahertz works smoothly with everything, but 2.4 has some problems. If we change the configuration I am not sure if it would fix the problem."
"The solution's price could be better."
"The solution needs to add an LTE solution and/or something in 3.5GHz."
"If someone wants to go to the location-based portal of the product, like the one available in Meraki, it would not be possible, and it is an area that needs improvement."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN's support services could be better."
"The modulation could be optimized for better performance, and the configuration should be made adaptive to ensure dynamic adjustments as needed."
"There is room for improvement in the support."
"Sometimes there are some latencies in devices. Otherwise, it is, for some time, not as stable."
"The scalability is good, but it could improve."
"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing."
"Technical support could be improved. They could respond a bit faster."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."
"The scalability and the support could be better."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 22 reviews while HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 8th in Wireless WAN with 16 reviews. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Wireless WAN, Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Fortinet FortiExtender, whereas HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN. See our Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. HPE Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.