We performed a comparison between Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."When we log in to the device, we can easily configure it. So it is quite user-friendly."
"The initial setup is easy to handle. It's quite simple."
"One could say that Cambium is a scalable solution."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is scalable. The XV2 model of the solution can support up to 216 people at a time."
"The solution's coverage range is good, it is easy to use, and deployment is very easy and user-friendly."
"Technical support has been good."
"What I find valuable is the fact that you don't need to purchase any license. Basically you just get the hardware for the access points, configure an IP and connect it with a switch."
"It is a good product for cloud management."
"The solution is easy to use and offers good management for wireless."
"There are numerous features, but what I like about Ruckus is that they have a good coverage range due to their BeamFlex technique."
"The most valuable solution is its simplicity. The solution is simple and easy to use."
"One of its notable advantages lies in the superior performance of its antennas and radios."
"The best feature of Ruckus Wireless WAN apart from its seamless roaming feature where you roam beautifully on the network is its analytics tool that gives you so much insight into your deployment, so it has become more of a business intelligence type of tool as well. I also like that Ruckus Networks, in terms of WiFi security issues on the WiFi protocols, is also the first company to give you notices of security issues, and also the first to provide patches for those issues. Ruckus Wireless WAN is very proactive and much, much faster than Cisco, Aruba, and Meraki."
"The feature I like most, is the product activity."
"Scalability is a valuable feature."
"The connectivity, speed, and reliability are very good."
"The solution needs to add an LTE solution and/or something in 3.5GHz."
"The product could have more access points to increase the network coverage."
"They could enhance the product's security features, particularly in analyzing and protecting against potential threats."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN could improve by providing a better signal range."
"The installation and configuration are a bit complex."
"If someone wants to go to the location-based portal of the product, like the one available in Meraki, it would not be possible, and it is an area that needs improvement."
"The installation is difficult."
"If it's in a warehouse, it is very hard to deploy."
"I would not consider this solution to be stable."
"Pricing is an area for improvement. The devices are relatively expensive."
"The solution needs to offer more analytics."
"The connectivity and mobility for users could be improved."
"In comparison to Cambium, I find Cambium to be more robust in terms of performance."
"In Cisco, there is a configuration where it automatically switches from the 2.4 GHz to 5.2 GHz frequency. But with Ruckus, usually, we need to manually define whether we want to use the 2.4 GHz or 5.2 GHz."
"We have one sole distributor here in our region. To have multiple distributors here would be very helpful to improve the supply chain."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN we have a lot of component shortages in the world. This has impacted deliveries. We have large back orders of the solution."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 23 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Cisco Wireless WAN and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN, whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless and HPE Wireless WAN. See our Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.