Most Helpful Review
Tech stack could be up-to-date. It is easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming.
Enables the seamless addition and changing of data and processes with no interruption to our business operations
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable.
I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features.
We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users.
For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly.
We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill.
We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features.
It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming.
The flexibility characteristic in a BPMS, through BPMN and DMN, is undoubtedly the most interesting feature for our business.
The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset.
This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them.
Customize workflow processes visually and interactively.
The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs.
The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools.
The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making.
The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions.
This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction.
The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself.
I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them.
When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved.
The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options.
If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI.
Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI.
Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date.
I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist.
The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky.
There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help.
This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites.
The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation.
If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable.
The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation.
Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus.
The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services.
Pricing and Cost Advice
It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range.
Great value for the money.
This solution has a very lost cost.
The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy.
The price is so reasonable.
I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost
Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user.
Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms.
out of 73 in Business Process Management
Average Words per Review
out of 73 in Business Process Management
Average Words per Review
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 100% of the time.
Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.
Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:
Non-coding workflow software for business process modelling and management, automation of business operations, and workflow productivity boost. Minimize dependency on IT and allows non-technical users to design, run and modify Workflows with drag-and-drop simplicity.
A wide variety of workflow management solutions have been built with Comindware Tracker across all industries, departments, and workflow scenarios and brought transparency and accountability in businesses.
Key benefits of Comindware Workflow Software:
The Workflow Management system enables non-code addition and modification of workflows with no interruption to ongoing activities. It ensures quick-win implementation and reduces expenses.
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about Comindware Tracker
|AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, Accruent||Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services|
Financial Services Firm22%
Software R&D Company19%
Comms Service Provider11%
No Data Available