Compare Camunda BPM vs. Comindware Tracker
Camunda BPM is ranked 1st in Business Process Management with 10 reviews while Comindware Tracker is ranked 9th in Business Process Management with 11 reviews. Camunda BPM is rated 8.2, while Comindware Tracker is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Camunda BPM writes "A good open-source solution with a robust user community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Enables the seamless addition and changing of data and processes with no interruption to our business operations". Camunda BPM is most compared with Bonita, IBM BPM and Pega BPM, whereas Comindware Tracker is most compared with Camunda BPM. See our Camunda BPM vs. Comindware Tracker report.
Most Helpful Review | |||
| |||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda BPM vs. Comindware Tracker and other solutions. Updated: January 2020. 390,810 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products. The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand. The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part. When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version. The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read. The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable. I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features. We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users. | The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset. This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them. Customize workflow processes visually and interactively. The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs. The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools. The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making. The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions. This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction. |
Cons | |
If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map. Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance. I would also like a very easy to use form builder. I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs. I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution. The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself. I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them. When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved. | The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky. There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help. This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites. The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation. If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable. The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation. Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus. The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
I use the open-source free version. Camunda is much cheaper. We are using the open-source version of this solution. It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range. | Great value for the money. This solution has a very lost cost. The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs. 390,810 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 26,239 Comparisons 17,218 Reviews 10 Average Words per Review 517 Avg. Rating 8.1 | Views 7,387 Comparisons 217 Reviews 12 Average Words per Review 367 Avg. Rating 9.4 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 22% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time. |  Compared 100% of the time. |
Learn | |
| camunda | Comindware |
Overview | |
Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules. Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:
| Non-coding workflow software for business process modelling and management, automation of business operations, and workflow productivity boost. Minimize dependency on IT and allows non-technical users to design, run and modify Workflows with drag-and-drop simplicity. A wide variety of workflow management solutions have been built with Comindware Tracker across all industries, departments, and workflow scenarios and brought transparency and accountability in businesses. Key benefits of Comindware Workflow Software:
The Workflow Management system enables non-code addition and modification of workflows with no interruption to ongoing activities. It ensures quick-win implementation and reduces expenses. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Camunda BPM | Learn more about Comindware Tracker |
Sample Customers | |
| AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, Accruent | Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services |
Top Industries | |
Non Profit29% Financial Services Firm29% Construction Company14% Comms Service Provider14% Software R&D Company29% Comms Service Provider16% Financial Services Firm13% Media Company6% | No Data Available |
Company Size | |
Small Business40% Midsize Enterprise20% Large Enterprise40% Small Business5% Midsize Enterprise16% Large Enterprise79% | Small Business58% Midsize Enterprise17% Large Enterprise25% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda BPM vs. Comindware Tracker and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
390,810 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Camunda BPM Reviews, Comindware Tracker Reviews, and our list of Best Business Process Management Companies.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.