We performed a comparison between Camunda and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Software AG and others in Business Process Design."The graphical interface is very beneficial."
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."
"It is an absolutely stable solution."
"There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable."
"Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
"OpenText Documentum's composition is good. It is convenient and straight out of the box."
"The most valuable feature is the management."
"It has reduced the amount of paper documents; reducing time and errors in the process."
"The product is tamper-proof and enables us to return to the document source, which is helpful in legal issues."
"The stability is very good."
"It is a very secure system. It is reliable, and that is one of the reasons people manage their content within Documentum. It gives them the confidence that the content is accessible to the right people and not to the wrong people."
"It is quite good."
"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"The initial setup can be complex for business users."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"The migration strategy needs to be improved."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"Sometimes DocBroker cannot see the DocBase."
"The biggest issue for us is the price of the product."
"The product needs to improve the way documents are logged together. I believe running it on the cloud or containerization will bring value to it. The tool's Time to Market and deployment cycle need to be improved. Finding suitable training materials for OpenText Documentum is also a bottleneck. If we can find the training modules easily, we can bring together people, give them quick training, and start working on the deployment. It can help with quick outputs."
"The main issue is the software's performance when storing around 10 million or more documents. It becomes slow and needs improvement. Perhaps it's a cloud-related issue, but it needs to be addressed. It could be due to our S3 bucket or something else. Nevertheless, this is a significant challenge we're facing."
"One area for improvement in OpenText Documentum is its handling of outdated documents, especially technical ones."
"It needs a better UI and it should also be cloud-ready. The UI has not changed in years."
"It's difficult to manage and customize Documentum."
Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 66 reviews while OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 25 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Pega BPM, Bizagi, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet and Hyland OnBase.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.