We performed a comparison between Camunda and Everest Blueriq based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out."
"The best feature is the automation."
"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."
"Camunda Platform is better than IBM BPM, and Azure. It is more elaborate."
"It has an open BPM"
"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers."
"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome."
"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."
"It is not difficult to change existing processes. The difficulty was in integration, for example, to call an external web API, and in the security capabilities, to use a vault for secrets. That was difficult."
"I don't like the UI of the Camunda Platform, I have found the Signavio solution to be much better for me to create the process designs and execute them. Additionally, I have found the tools in the Camunda Platform are not compatible with some of my other tools. They should improve this in the future."
"In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process evaluation (optimize) features added to the community edition."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"The documentation could use improvement."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 68 reviews while Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
