Compare Camunda BPM vs. Nintex Workflow

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda BPM Logo
35,334 views|23,059 comparisons
Nintex Workflow Logo
3,717 views|2,548 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda BPM vs. Nintex Workflow and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly.""We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users.""I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features.""The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable.""The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.""When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.""The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part.""The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."

More Camunda BPM Pros »

"It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper.""We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality.""I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability.""It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."

More Nintex Workflow Pros »

Cons
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options.""When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved.""I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them.""The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself.""I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.""I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.""I would also like a very easy to use form builder.""Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."

More Camunda BPM Cons »

"We are currently facing a lot of issues with Nintex, and we are trying to move away from this solution.""The security features for this solution need to be improved.""Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool.""The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper.""We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems."

More Nintex Workflow Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We are using the open-source version of this solution.""Camunda is much cheaper.""I use the open-source free version.""The open-source version of the product is free to use.""The cost of this solution is better than some competing products.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year.""We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost.""I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."

More Camunda BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The annual support costs are expensive.""Comparatively, it's expensive.""We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."

More Nintex Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Hi dear knauf its pleasure to see you in a good position, you were always in the top of specialist. your advise and solutions make your customer to takeoff their business.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
35,334
Comparisons
23,059
Reviews
19
Average Words per Review
567
Rating
7.9
Views
3,717
Comparisons
2,548
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
433
Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
Nintex Workflow Platform
Learn
camunda
Nintex
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation

At Nintex, our goal is to make work more meaningful by improving business processes. With the Nintex Platform, your organization can manage, automate, and optimize your business processes - all with clicks, not code.

Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about Nintex Workflow
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentAsiacell, Hawke’s Bay Regional Council, National Metrology Institute of South Africa, Norwegian Olympic Committee, Schnitzer Steel, MT Højgaard, Lippuner
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
Comms Service Provider23%
Non Profit15%
Government15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government13%
Retailer7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business52%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise31%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise64%
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise64%
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda BPM vs. Nintex Workflow and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Camunda BPM is ranked 1st in Business Process Management with 19 reviews while Nintex Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management with 5 reviews. Camunda BPM is rated 7.8, while Nintex Workflow is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Camunda BPM writes "Component reusability saves us development time, but the learning curve is too steep". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Workflow writes "Reduces time spent on manual processes but did not scale with our usage". Camunda BPM is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bonita, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and K2, whereas Nintex Workflow is most compared with K2, AgilePoint, Pega BPM, Bizagi and ARIS BPM. See our Camunda BPM vs. Nintex Workflow report.

See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.