We performed a comparison between Camunda and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are that it's lightweight, can be embedded in existing Java code, and keeps track of the workflow state and the instances that we need."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."
"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."
"Camunda's process diagram creation and deployment is very easy."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"The latency of API could be decreased."
"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"While it's very scalable, it would be great if auto-scaling capabilities were added to it... one area that really could help out would be to have dynamic resizing of the cluster. Right now, you have to do capacity planning."
"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved."
"The business model could be easier to understand."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 68 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with . See our Camunda vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
