Compare Camunda BPM vs. OpenText Process 360

Camunda BPM is ranked 1st in Business Process Management with 10 reviews while OpenText Process 360 is ranked 22nd in Business Process Management with 2 reviews. Camunda BPM is rated 8.2, while OpenText Process 360 is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda BPM writes "A good open-source solution with a robust user community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Process 360 writes "You can use all the features without worrying about making the system update patches, all of the issues are taken care of in the cloud version". Camunda BPM is most compared with Bonita, Pega BPM and IBM BPM, whereas OpenText Process 360 is most compared with Pega BPM, Kofax TotalAgility and IBM BPM. See our Camunda BPM vs. OpenText Process 360 report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda BPM Logo
25,626 views|16,841 comparisons
OpenText Process 360 Logo
1,061 views|579 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda BPM vs. OpenText Process 360 and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
382,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products.The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part.When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable.I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features.We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users.

Read more »

It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches.We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes.

Read more »

Cons
If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map.Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance.I would also like a very easy to use form builder.I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself.I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them.When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved.

Read more »

They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them.We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
I use the open-source free version.Camunda is much cheaper.We are using the open-source version of this solution.It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
382,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
25,626
Comparisons
16,841
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
517
Avg. Rating
8.1
Views
1,061
Comparisons
579
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
547
Avg. Rating
7.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
Process 360, Global 360
Learn
camunda
OpenText
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation
With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.
Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about OpenText Process 360
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentiTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Non Profit29%
Financial Services Firm29%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company27%
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider15%
Media Company6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise43%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business4%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise84%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda BPM vs. OpenText Process 360 and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
382,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email