We performed a comparison between Camunda and Genpact Cora SeQuence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The flexibility is great."
"One valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well."
"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."
"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"The latency of API could be decreased."
"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."
"Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use. It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it."
"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."
"When addressing a complex and extensive process, the domain it belongs to, be it banking, healthcare, or HR, requires widespread access."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 68 reviews while Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 38th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Appian, IBM BPM, Hubble and Tungsten TotalAgility. See our Camunda vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
