Compare Camunda BPM vs. ProcessMaker

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda BPM Logo
34,788 views|22,648 comparisons
ProcessMaker Logo
315 views|215 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management. Updated: November 2020.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill.""For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly.""We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users.""I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features.""The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable.""The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.""When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.""The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."

More Camunda BPM Pros »

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

More ProcessMaker Pros »

Cons
"If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI.""The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options.""When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved.""I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them.""The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself.""I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.""I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.""I would also like a very easy to use form builder."

More Camunda BPM Cons »

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

More ProcessMaker Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range.""We are using the open-source version of this solution.""Camunda is much cheaper.""I use the open-source free version.""The open-source version of the product is free to use.""The cost of this solution is better than some competing products.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year.""We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."

More Camunda BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Hi dear knauf its pleasure to see you in a good position, you were always in the top of specialist. your advise and solutions make your customer to takeoff their business.
Top Answer: What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities.
Top Answer: This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects. This will make it more impactful because as it… more »
Top Answer: ProcessMaker is an Omnibus-style software. We use it for many of the services within the bank, such as generating a form or filling out a form that passes through different layers of approval. There… more »
Ranking
Views
34,788
Comparisons
22,648
Reviews
17
Average Words per Review
568
Avg. Rating
7.9
Views
315
Comparisons
215
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,215
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM
Learn
camunda
ProcessMaker
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about ProcessMaker
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentTulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
Comms Service Provider23%
Non Profit15%
Government15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm9%
Media Company6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business52%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise33%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise66%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management. Updated: November 2020.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Camunda BPM is ranked 1st in Business Process Management with 18 reviews while ProcessMaker is ranked 20th in Business Process Management with 1 review. Camunda BPM is rated 8.0, while ProcessMaker is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Camunda BPM writes "Component reusability saves us development time, but the learning curve is too steep". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". Camunda BPM is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bonita, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Bizagi, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Bonita, Apache Airflow and Appian.

See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.