We performed a comparison between Camunda and Red Hat Polymita Business Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."
"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."
"It has an open BPM"
"Camunda is a scalable product."
"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."
"The graphical interface is very beneficial."
"We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."
"The main factor that separates Red Hat software from Oracle, IBM, Pegasystems, is the ability that it gives you to design the screens outside the software and connect it as another component with the BPM engine."
"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself."
"If they could build some scripts or some configuration to get it up and running in a Docker environment, that would be good. I didn't find anything when on Docker, however, maybe they have something and I didn't see it yet."
"I think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
"I think the documentation for the tool, the official documentation, is not as strong as in other tools. You have lot of community. That is good. But sometimes you need - when you are working on a big client or a critical process - to be certain about certain things. So I think that the documentation for the tool, from the company, could be a little stronger."
More Red Hat Polymita Business Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 68 reviews while Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is ranked 50th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Polymita Business Suite writes "Gives you the ability to design the screens outside the software and connect them as a component with the BPM engine". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
