We performed a comparison between Camunda and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design."I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"The graphical interface is very beneficial."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."
"It's user friendly, much better than most tools I have seen."
"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."
"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."
"It has reduced the amount of paper documents; reducing time and errors in the process."
"The most valuable feature is the management."
"OpenText Documentum's composition is good. It is convenient and straight out of the box."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the security, storage, and document search capability."
"The storage of metadata content, workflows, and life cycles are the most valuable features of OpenText Documentum."
"It provides possibilities for us to save documents and supporting the business process while doing so."
"I appreciate Documentum's scalability, allowing for vast volumes of content storage."
"We primarily use it for storing documents. We host a variety of documents in OpenText Documentum. This includes raw files, analyzed files, and documents in multiple formats."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks."
"The business model could be easier to understand."
"Documentation can be improved."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
"The latency of API could be decreased."
"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."
"It needs a better UI and it should also be cloud-ready. The UI has not changed in years."
"I would like to see performance improvements, especially regarding slow response times."
"One area for improvement in OpenText Documentum is its handling of outdated documents, especially technical ones."
"In BPM could be better. Its GUI needs the ability to build more rules. This is a crucial feature. For example, OpenText has some products that allow you to control your checks, invoices, and so on. They have exciting approaches to converting pictures to text, but the tool for business process management isn't easy to use. The GIU is not so good."
"The user interface can be a bit more intuitive."
"OpenText Documentum is moving to the cloud, and I am concerned about the security aspect of it."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"We mostly use the Life Sciences package. That package is somewhat dated. There should be enhancements to the Life Science package and additional offerings to support pharma in particular."
Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 67 reviews while OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
