We performed a comparison between Camunda and Everest Blueriq based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products."
"Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele."
"Camunda's process diagram creation and deployment is very easy."
"It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes."
"The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out."
"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."
"It's user friendly, much better than most tools I have seen."
"The flexibility characteristic in a BPMS, through BPMN and DMN, is undoubtedly the most interesting feature for our business."
"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."
"The business model could be easier to understand."
"I think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack."
"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"The migration strategy needs to be improved."
"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 66 reviews while Everest Blueriq is ranked 32nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Pega BPM, Bizagi, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.