Piotr MazurDigital Transformation Solution Manager at Altkom Software & Consutling
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"We are using the open-source version of this solution."
"Camunda is much cheaper."
"I use the open-source free version."
"The open-source version of the product is free to use."
"The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
"Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
"We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."
Earn 20 points
Reinventing Process Automation for the Digital Enterprise
Our process automation platform enables tens of thousands of developers to design, automate and improve processes and provide better customer experiences, deliver projects faster and increase business agility.
A complete process automation tech stack with powerful execution engines for BPMN workflows and DMN decisions paired with essential applications for modeling, operations and analytics
Camunda Platform is ranked 1st in Business Process Management with 20 reviews while Everest Blueriq is ranked 44th in Business Process Management. Camunda Platform is rated 8.0, while Everest Blueriq is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Camunda Platform writes "Component reusability saves us development time, but the learning curve is too steep". On the other hand, Camunda Platform is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bonita, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Bizagi, whereas Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM and IBM BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.