Camunda vs IBM Case Foundation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda Logo
33,229 views|20,177 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
499 views|401 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Camunda and IBM Case Foundation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. IBM Case Foundation Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is good for data models.""The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it.""We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation.""Camunda is a scalable product.""Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele.""The flexibility is great.""I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite.""It has an open BPM"

More Camunda Pros →

"Flexible and the ability to divide search screens, and to search for documents. The ECM feature inside the system is great.""The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features.""The solution is scalable.""The most valuable feature is the content manager part of the file as it is very stable, robust, and reliable.""The content management is great.""Case Foundation provides a strong security boost.""It provides us the capability of producing b​​usiness processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository.""The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it."

More IBM Case Foundation Pros →

Cons
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month.""The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners.""In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process evaluation (optimize) features added to the community edition.""An improvement would be to support Angular 2 instead of AngularJS, which is quite old.""When addressing a complex and extensive process, the domain it belongs to, be it banking, healthcare, or HR, requires widespread access.""I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.""I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist.""If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."

More Camunda Cons →

"​The place of improvement is merging or combining all of the workflow functionality into one seamless tool. Now, there are multiple installations that are different. Case Foundation, before you can put Case Manager and you've got IBM BPM, and the roadmap is there to merge them altogether. But that's the struggle at the moment, it's having multiple installations and disparate workflow applications.​""The solution can be quite expensive.""The cloud version could use more stability.""The interface needs to be more user-friendly.""There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer""90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly.""IBM needs to update the user interfaces of all its products to make them more intuitive and accessible to beginners. Compared to Microsoft products, IBM solutions are less user-friendly. IBM programs are hard to master. It's a problem in my region because it's hard to find IT staff who can work with IBM.""We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic."

More IBM Case Foundation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."
  • "We are using the open-source version of this solution."
  • "Camunda is much cheaper."
  • "I use the open-source free version."
  • "The open-source version of the product is free to use."
  • "The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
  • "Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
  • "We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
  • More Camunda Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."
  • "This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license."
  • "IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."
  • "The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either."
  • More IBM Case Foundation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You can… more »
    Top Answer:Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to… more »
    Top Answer:Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very… more »
    Top Answer: A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting.
    Top Answer:The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either. I would rate it five out of ten.
    Top Answer:There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    33,229
    Comparisons
    20,177
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    911
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    499
    Comparisons
    401
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    536
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Camunda BPM
    Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager
    Learn More
    Camunda
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

    IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.
    Sample Customers
    24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
    Suncorp Group Limited
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Government13%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Insurance Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Government15%
    Insurance Company10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise32%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Camunda vs. IBM Case Foundation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. IBM Case Foundation and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 68 reviews while IBM Case Foundation is ranked 22nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while IBM Case Foundation is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Streamlined business process automation with user-friendly design". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow. See our Camunda vs. IBM Case Foundation report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.