We performed a comparison between Camunda and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."
"There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable."
", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."
"We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well."
"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."
"The initial setup can be complex for business users."
"The support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks."
"In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process evaluation (optimize) features added to the community edition."
"There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people."
"I think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 68 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with Apache Airflow and TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM. See our Camunda vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
