• Home
  • Canon DreamLabo 5000 vs. HP Scitex

Canon DreamLabo 5000 vs HP Scitex comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Canon Logo

Canon DreamLabo 5000

719 views|388 comparisons
HP Logo

HP Scitex

131 views|88 comparisons
Ranking
3rd
out of 32 in Enterprise Printing
Views
719
Comparisons
388
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
15th
out of 32 in Enterprise Printing
Views
131
Comparisons
88
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Canon
HP
Overview

Canon's DreamLabo 5000, 7-color inkjet photographic printer delivers a wide color gamut, smooth gradations, vibrant and accurate color reproduction and premium paper options.Featuring ultra-high image resolution, enhanced color range and print quality, your photographs will print in stunning, outstanding image detail and vividness - Create photo books, single prints, calendars, photo cards and more!

Information Not Available
Sample Customers
Kyas Photography, Sanders Group, Falquon, Projectcolor, Von Hagen GmbH, Print Foundry, Eyes On Media, FT Solution, Nama
Active Display Group
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company14%
Computer Software Company11%
Media Company9%
Comms Service Provider8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise39%
No Data Available

Canon DreamLabo 5000 is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Printing while HP Scitex is ranked 15th in Enterprise Printing. Canon DreamLabo 5000 is rated 0.0, while HP Scitex is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Canon DreamLabo 5000 is most compared with HP Indigo, HP LaserJet Enterprise and Xerox iGen, whereas HP Scitex is most compared with Xerox iGen and HP Indigo.

See our list of best Enterprise Printing vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Printing reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.