Canonical LXD vs Spoonium comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Canonical Logo
279 views|158 comparisons
Spoon Logo
views| comparisons
Ranking
Views
279
Comparisons
158
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Container Virtualization
Comparisons
Learn More
Canonical
Video Not Available
Spoon
Video Not Available
Overview

LXD is a container "hypervisor" and a new user experience for LXC. Specifically, it's made of three components: A system-wide daemon (lxd) A command line client (lxc) An OpenStack Nova plugin (nova-compute-lxd) The daemon exports a REST API both locally and if enabled, over the network. The command line tool is designed to be a very simple, yet very powerful tool to manage all your containers. It can handle connect to multiple container hosts and easily give you an overview of all the containers on your network, let you create some more where you want them and even move them around while they're running. The OpenStack plugin then allows you to use your lxd hosts as compute nodes, running workloads on containers rather than virtual machines. The LXD project was founded and is currently led by Canonical Ltd and Ubuntu with contributions from a range of other companies and individual contributors.

Information Not Available
Sample Customers
GNU, Ubuntu, MySQL, Bugzilla, Debian, MariaDB, Drizzle, Inkscape, Gwibber, Squid Cache, Launchpad, BitlBee
Novell, LANDESK Software

Canonical LXD is ranked 2nd in Container Virtualization while Spoonium doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Container Virtualization. Canonical LXD is rated 0.0, while Spoonium is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Canonical LXD is most compared with Mirantis Container Cloud, CoreOS Rocket and Flockport, whereas Spoonium is most compared with .

We monitor all Container Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.