Capgemini Cloud Choice vs IBM Cloud Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
104
Comparisons
90
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
7th
Views
227
Comparisons
175
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Cloud Choice is a complete portfolio of services that deliver a cloud-first way of working for the enterprise. From defining a roadmap, to managing the hybrid enterprise, we help you overcome the barriers to using the cloud to improve performance. We turn your cloud-first strategy into a reality that gives your business the efficiency, agility and flexibility it needs to compete in the digital era.

IBM Cloud Management and Operations Consulting services provides the help you need to transition to a hybrid cloud environment. Experienced IBM consultants can provide you with a workshop, roadmap assessment, business case creation, architecture design, implementation planning and integration assistance. These services use an IT-as-a-Service (ITaaS) model to help you improve operations and governance, reduce IT costs and understand your investment options.

Sample Customers
City of Bergen, EnergyPath, VDAB, NCC, Novozymes, Cloudera, SEB, Barco
American Airlines, Bitly, Apprenda, Runkeeper, Honda

Capgemini Cloud Choice is ranked 2nd in Public Cloud Infrastructure Managed Service Providers while IBM Cloud Services is ranked 7th in Hybrid Cloud Consulting. Capgemini Cloud Choice is rated 0.0, while IBM Cloud Services is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Capgemini Cloud Choice is most compared with HCL Cloud Computing Services and Cognizant Cloud Consulting, whereas IBM Cloud Services is most compared with Accenture Hybrid Cloud Computing.

We monitor all Public Cloud Infrastructure Managed Service Providers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.