We performed a comparison between Galvanize IncidentBond and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."The customization and the transparency of data while still maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI, are key features. It allows for me, as an engineer, to evolve the individual components and modules, and to create a much more meaningful picture than the individual pieces in isolation ever could."
"We have another piece of that infrastructure that does what they call threat emulation. It's like sandboxing where it takes files that it doesn't know about, puts them in a VM-type environment, and it kicks them off to see if there's any malware or tendencies that might look like malware, that kind of thing."
"The triage feature that shows you the whole chain of the malware is useful."
"I found the offline scanning to be particularly useful."
"I like the historical features, interface, and integration."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup was straightforward."
"There's lots of very useful documentation online to help troubleshoot and learn about the product."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint was easy."
"Once the solution is installed and configured correctly it does not require a lot of hands-on attention until you need upgrading."
"Stable – Release – Experimental" system with their releases, and all the proper checks and balances, I’d be an incredibly happy individual. I can appreciate the cause and affect, wherein the customization of the tool drives rapid release schedules, and the paradox that creates with the idea of stable releases. I’d also like more transparency about known bugs and issues."
"The UI interface needs improvement. The management needs further work in future versions."
"The solution would be more effective if there was a way to block automatically based on behavior."
"In our company, we also wanted to have network detection, like a host-based IDS on VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, but we did not get it."
"The tech support communicates, but it's just not with movement."
"It would be nice to have additional forensic tools that you can build into the back end."
"Carbon Black needs to do a better job of proving their platform in the industry, and providing a bit more access to do industry testing with real world examples to help prove their platform."
"The solution needs better overall compatibility with other products."
"Adding an application and a device control feature would be a great help for this solution."
Earn 20 points
Galvanize IncidentBond is ranked 11th in Security Incident Response while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is ranked 1st in Security Incident Response with 61 reviews. Galvanize IncidentBond is rated 9.0, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Galvanize IncidentBond writes "Customization and transparency of data, while maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint writes "Centralization via the cloud allows us to protect and control people working from home". Galvanize IncidentBond is most compared with , whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Symantec Endpoint Security.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
