We compared Trend Micro Deep Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on our users reviews in five parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: When comparing Trend Micro Deep Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, it is generally believed that Deep Security has a simpler and more straightforward initial setup. Deep Security also offers a wider variety of deployment options and provides helpful documentation and video tutorials. Conversely, Carbon Black Endpoint's setup can be more difficult, requiring complex configurations and customized policies. However, Carbon Black Endpoint has advantageous features like MDR capability and a whitelisting process for protection against zero-day threats. Deep Security has a smaller impact on system resources and efficient threat detection, whereas Carbon Black Endpoint offers superior log analysis and continuous monitoring. Some customers find Deep Security's pricing to be high, while Carbon Black Endpoint is generally described as expensive. The quality of customer service for both products has received mixed reviews and has room for improvement.
"It is a scalable solution. If required, we can scale it more. That's not an issue...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."
"It helps with virtual patching and IDS fetching."
"Deep Security is a good product for managing a few servers."
"The solution has a low footprint and does not have a lot of impact on the host."
"The user interface is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the virtual path function, which is the reason we chose to implement it."
"They release timely updates and have efficient prediction features for threat detection."
"Some of the main features of this solution are it is reliable and can be used in small to large size businesses."
"Carbon Black Defense has a higher detection ratio because it's cloud-based and it also does a lookup to virus total."
"The solution has a very nice API on the back end for remoting into a system and executing scripts or utilizing self automation."
"This product has the capability of uploading scripts to the tool and this is a very comprehensive feature."
"The threat analysis functionality is good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is one of the best EDR tools in the market."
"It is a very complete platform."
"The best feature of this solution is that we have a live response, which is really tailored to our needs."
"For Carbon Black Endpoint, the possibility of integration with different other software's log servers is the important thing. Having just one point of view is more interesting so you don't need to go to different places to see all the information."
"f it had the capability of generating retroactive alerts it would be helpful."
"It would be helpful if they could send emails notifying their users about the recommended upgraded versions to address the newly discovered vulnerabilities."
"I would like them to add EDR features, moving away from traditional signature-based anti-malware."
"The tool needs to improve its subscription."
"The product isn't very user-friendly."
"We'd like to see extended capacity in the on-premises versions."
"They need to build in a central console because central integration is not very good right now."
"The tool should integrate SIM functionality. It should also improve customer support."
"The solution has to mature on container security and a lot of cloud environment security."
"The node management could be much better. The one thing that they cannot do very easily is change the tenant from a backend."
"It is difficult to extract reports for ongoing scans"
"The GUI and reporting should be addressed and the product's administration features need fine tuning."
"It could be a bit complicated. You have to be very familiar with Carbon Black to understand what it is doing and why it is doing. I would like to have more explanations and simplification in the user interface. It would be good to get help and see more explanations. It should tell us that a software is blocked and the reason for it. It would be good to be able to build chains in terms of what caused what, what worked, and what caused an issue. We are now moving from Carbon Black to Cortex XDR. While choosing antivirus software, we were also looking at Carbon Black because it also has an antivirus package, and it is next-generation, but we were told that Carbon Black doesn't support firewalls. We have Palo Alto firewalls. We would have chosen this solution if it supported firewalls, in particular next-generation firewalls, but unfortunately, it doesn't. Therefore, we decided on Cortex XDR because it integrates with Palo Alto firewalls."
"The solution needs expanded endpoint query tools."
"There is room for improvement in the support and service team."
"At this point, we're test-bedding several other providers right now to see if there's anything that does equally or better and that comes at a better price point."
Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 29 reviews while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is ranked 13th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 23 reviews. Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "Supports virtual patching, and is easy to deploy, use, and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint writes "Advanced threat detection but compatibility issues with some operating systems". Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Micro Apex One, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and Trellix Endpoint Security, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Symantec Endpoint Security and Trellix Endpoint Security.
We monitor all Virtualization Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.