Anonymous UserSenior Cyberecurity Manager at a financial services firm
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"They're highly stable in comparison with other solutions I have."
"Carbon Black insures the probability that any ransomware will be stopped before spreading."
"Integration and scalability are the most valuable."
"The market information they gather from the community is really good. Their configuration capabilities are good."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to seek out abnormal activity and to create alerts."
"The detection response and quarantining are very good features."
"The feature I find most valuable, is the reality graphical user interface."
"This solution requires less management and is very easy to use."
"We are using almost all of the features and we find it quite good overall."
"It can be deployed in autonomous mode, and then it automatically blocks malware threats."
"The product is very easy to use. Customers really appreciate that."
"The most valuable feature is the monitored support behind it."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is that the configuration and the usage of the product are not so complicated. For people responsible for using this infrastructure for the first line of workstation monitoring, it's quite easy to use."
"The dashboard is beautiful, overall easy of use, and the UBA and NBA features are valued."
"The dashboard should be more user-friendly."
"The cloud console has a lot of bugs and issues in the analysis part."
"It's not simple."
"They have different products, but if we wanted to take their protection and their EPR, then we would need to have two agents"
"It's not highly available, so you have to have a core server. If the primary server goes down, you need a new one. It's not available at the same time, however. It's not automatically swapped from one server to another."
"The product detects too many false positives initially and it could integrate better with other security solutions."
"I think the technical support could be better."
"A support center in Asia is needed."
"I would like to see support for mobile protection and some additional reports included."
"Could have better integration with other security applications."
"The solution just needs to keep maturing and they need to keep up with the threat landscape to ensure they're protecting clients well as time passes."
"Most of their times are in Greenwich Mean Time. I would like to see more local time zones."
"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the usability of this product for new threats. Meaning, not everything which is new is properly seen by the product and not all the required actions are taken."
"Compliance reports need to improve."
"It gives you a high level of protection at a very good price."
"Everything is included in this one solution and the pricing is pretty competitive."
"Our billing is on a quarterly basis, but they have monthly or annual billing availability."
"The price should not be less than $100 which is quite reasonable for this solution because you are getting multiple components."
"Its licensing is on a monthly basis."
"Pricing wise, Cynet seems to be very competitive. The cost is probably lower than that offered by many of its competitors for all the functions and features it offers."
CB Response is an industry-leading incident response and threat hunting solution designed
for security operations center (SOC) teams. CB Response continuously records and stores
unfiltered endpoint data, so that security professionals can hunt threats in real time and
visualize the complete attack kill chain. It leverages the CB Predictive Security Cloud’s
aggregated threat intelligence, which is applied to the endpoint activity system of record for
evidence and detection of these identified threats and patterns of behavior.
Cynet has pioneered the security industry’s first all-in-one security platform purposely built for organizations that need the ability to effortlessly identify, block and respond to all types of attacks inside the perimeter - defending endpoints, network, files and users - without the heavy burden of deep cyber expertise and the overhead of integrating and managing multiple products. Our approach converges and brings synergy with technology: endpoint protection, EDR, vulnerability management, deception, threat intelligence and network and end-user analytics, and expertise: a 24/7 cyber SWAT team for incident response, malware analysis, threat hunting and forensics. Cynet deploys in hours and simplifies management with automated monitoring to complement any sized staff.
Carbon Black CB Response is ranked 2nd in Security Incident Response with 6 reviews while Cynet is ranked 2nd in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 10 reviews. Carbon Black CB Response is rated 8.8, while Cynet is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Carbon Black CB Response writes "Malicious activity detection response and automatic quarantining for endpoint security of your environment ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cynet writes "Very user friendly but must expand threat detection for new threats". Carbon Black CB Response is most compared with Carbon Black CB Defense, Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response, Fidelis Elevate, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Splunk Phantom, whereas Cynet is most compared with Darktrace, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and McAfee Endpoint Security. See our Carbon Black CB Response vs. Cynet report.
See our list of .
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.